Polar Vortex Causes Hundreds Of Injuries

Quote from jem:

you are the nutter idiot

salbys charts and data were there for you to see and are supported by the recent study I have posted for you many times.

here it is again...


See: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.08.008





The highlights of the paper are:

► The overall global temperature change sequence of events appears to be from 1) the ocean surface to 2) the land surface to 3) the lower troposphere.

► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature.

► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5-10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature.

► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature.

► Changes in ocean temperatures appear to explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980.

► CO2 released from use of fossil fuels have little influence on the observed changes in the amount of atmospheric CO2, and changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.

The paper:

The phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature

Ole Humluma, b,
Kjell Stordahlc,
Jan-Erik Solheimd

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08/...global-warming/



Water gets warm so it is not wet.


The above statement is just as true and relevant as the piece you posted.
 
here is a better non sequitor...

co2 accumulation and dissipation trail (and track with) ocean temperature change so co2 must cause warming.


Quote from futurecurrents:

Water gets warm so it is not wet.


The above statement is just as true and relevant as the piece you posted.
 
Quote from jem:

here is a better non sequitor...

co2 accumulation and dissipation trail (and track with) ocean temperature change so co2 must cause warming.

Speaking of rising CO2 causing temps to rise......


1000yr_change.jpg
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Speaking of rising CO2 causing temps to rise......


1000yr_change.jpg

Dude, you keep posting the same shit over and over again. 1000 years isn't enough time to measure something when you're comparing to the life span of an object 4.25 billion years old. It just isn't, no matter how many times you post the chart.
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

Dude, you keep posting the same shit over and over again. 1000 years isn't enough time to measure something when you're comparing to the life span of an object 4.25 billion years old. It just isn't, no matter how many times you post the chart.

Yes, but showing data that the earth has been much warmer and much cooler long before man doesn't help with the tax collection.
 
Quote from OccupyThis:

Yes, but showing data that the earth has been much warmer and much cooler long before man doesn't help with the tax collection.

:D
 
if your distorted perspective chart is accurate it shows co2 trailing temperature change...


See: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.08.008





The highlights of the paper are:

► The overall global temperature change sequence of events appears to be from 1) the ocean surface to 2) the land surface to 3) the lower troposphere.

► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature.

► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5-10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature.

► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature.

► Changes in ocean temperatures appear to explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980.

► CO2 released from use of fossil fuels have little influence on the observed changes in the amount of atmospheric CO2, and changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.

The paper:

The phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature

Ole Humluma, b,
Kjell Stordahlc,
Jan-Erik Solheimd

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08/...global-warming/











Quote from futurecurrents:

Speaking of rising CO2 causing temps to rise......


1000yr_change.jpg
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

Dude, you keep posting the same shit over and over again. 1000 years isn't enough time to measure something when you're comparing to the life span of an object 4.25 billion years old. It just isn't, no matter how many times you post the chart.

I'm beginning to think that you are simply stupid.
 
Back
Top