yeah... I am sorry man but it just pains me that you are being so rude to everyone and you clearly don't know much about poker at all. Yeah, maybe in the year 2000 this worked for you but not now haha. I have been a profitable poker player for years and I am new to trading. The more I learn, the more correlation i see with poker. I see you understand position strength and perhaps draw equity. but you clearly dont know anything about range. Range is the biggest "Indicator" that you can use but in relation to the other "indicators" such as pot odds, draw equity, fold equity, all stack sizes etc. Range takes people a lot of studying off the table to gain a adequate grasp. Range is a very complicated and vast subject but is king. So just like in trading, Its about using these indications that are not all concrete to attempt to make +EV plays opposed to -EV. So please stop acting like you know everything.
As for everyone else. yes there is a lot of correlations between the two. Going from a profitable poker playing to trading I assume will give you a leg up for many different reasons. However,if you are not a profitable poker player (in recent years) and have no desire to become one. It should be clear not to start training with poker analysis to assist with your trading. haha
Edit: Think of it like you were a great skateboarder. Transitioning to snowboarding you would have a leg up opposed to having no experience on a board. However you still need to go through a certain amount of the learning curve. So clearly you wanting to practice skateboarding only to become a better snowboarder just doesn't make sense because even tho they are similar, they're just not the same.
Right! Putting villains on ranges is critical, one of the most important skills to develop in hold'em. Negreanu and Ivey are masters.
See 2plus2 forum. On the flip side, being adaptive based on ranges you play in early vs late position is key.
I won my first small tournament 7 years ago.

