Let's face it nobody is more valuable as an opinion provider than our @tommcginis. So thanks Sir for your post.![]()














"Phew! Glad that's over."
Nope!
Last edited:
Let's face it nobody is more valuable as an opinion provider than our @tommcginis. So thanks Sir for your post.![]()














![]()
![]()
![]()
"Phew! Glad that's over."
Nope!
...Of course they are similar, bankroll management, self awareness of bias, non-attachment to hand/trade/money, patience......fold fold fold. The difference personally and it's big is.....TILT.
I think the ability to blow yourself up with trading makes the Tilt factor so big. In poker, even if I went on full blown drunken tilt mode, the worse I did was maybe lose 3k in a night(50k bankroll)...
But isn't that how it can go in no-limit against a stronger player? I imagine the writers for the Rounders movie did a lot of research to get this stuff right. And from what I have seen watching poker on TV, the really good guys, there are actually folks out there who can do this sort of thing...
Dis b tru!Oh, gimme a break.
If you REALLY know what you're doing in the financial markets, you could trade the ES for 2 points per day on a 20-lot. That's $500K/year... and you could do it with $10K initial margin. (I have a wealthy fried who claims to one year to have captured 9.5 points/day. Having that in mind, I haven't been able to do that well. But if he can make that, perhaps it's reasonable for you to make 2?)
Highly leveraged or not... as a trader you should be able to take 2 points/day from the ES. (If you don't feel capable of that, keep working on it. Rewards await.)
You don't have to "kill it". Grind out 2-points per day and you will wind up being the next Tom Vu.
I played poker full time for 6 years until 2011 when online poker pulled out of the US and i was forced to find another profession. I recently said this in a recent thread but this thread fits it perfectly so i'll say it again, poker have helped tremendously in helping me to become a profitable trader.
Here are a few things I can think of where poker have helped;
Emotional discipline: there isn’t a poker player in the world that can I say I have never tilt at the tables. I’m guilty of tilting at the tables many times but the experience with Poker helped to keep my emotions under control while trading. I hardly ever get affected by losses if I know I traded according to my plan. But if I was to ever feel that I am emotionally affected by losses or if I’m not all there mentality, I will immediately trade smaller or walk away and take a break.
The importance of a game plan and sticking to it: Because of poker from day one in my trading career I know not to worry so much about the amount of money won or loss when starting out but to concentrate more on your execution, trading small, learning, and following your trading rules.
Problem solving skills: I feel that the stock market is one big puzzle that is constantly changing and the more of it u solve the more money u will make. Poker have helped with my problem solving skills.
Pattern recognition: as an online player u can’t physically see ur opponent so u have to learn to analyze your opponents through betting patterns, timing tells, positioning, stake sizes, tendencies, playing statistics, past experiences, basic math, risk/reward, and guessing hand ranges. These experiences helped with my analytical skills and is useful In interpreting price action and reading graphs.
Thinking fast on my feet and multitasking: at one point in time I was able to play 20 tables simultaneously and u have a time bank to make your decisions so it forces u to think fast and multitask. Because of this, I can manage 8-10 day trades pretty efficiently and act fast base on what I see.
Adapting to changes: in order to make money at poker u have to adapt to the players at the table and this is no different in stocks because u have to adapt to market conditions.
Bankroll management: it’s pretty much the same concept for poker and stocks.
TOTAL HOGWASH! The two are so materially different that there is no correlation.
GS may hope there is an edge and it's transferable, but no.