Please Stop Mutilation of Boys - Circumcision!
- Thread starter shortie
- Start date
That is bullshit study, they used very questionable data sample with high-risk sexual behavior male against normal data pool, there has not been any definitive evidence to support the claim that circumcision of the male partner reduces the risk of cervical cancer.
Don't push your religious belief on other, there is no scientific reason for male to be circumcised. It is abnormal and form of public mutilation, It is sickening. It gives people false sense of security, which make people to take more risky sexual behavior.
Bullshit study, eh? There are plenty of articles out there. Just Google "male circumcision cervical cancer". We have articles from Reuters, New York Times, New England Journal of Medicine, etc etc, from 2002 to 2011. In the New York Times article, they also mention the man having decreased risk of contracting HIV. So, who would I believe, number22, or all those authorities?
Quote from Petsamo:
Bullshit study, eh? There are plenty of articles out there. Just Google "male circumcision cervical cancer". We have articles from Reuters, New York Times, New England Journal of Medicine, etc etc, from 2002 to 2011. In the New York Times article, they also mention the man having decreased risk of contracting HIV. So, who would I believe, number22, or all those authorities?
Persistent infections with high-risk HPVs are the primary cause of cervical cancer...
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/HPV
Number22, you had better go get your ass circumcised - ahhh, well, what ever part you use. :eek:Quote from Petsamo:
Bullshit study, eh? There are plenty of articles out there. Just Google "male circumcision cervical cancer". We have articles from Reuters, New York Times, New England Journal of Medicine, etc etc, from 2002 to 2011. In the New York Times article, they also mention the man having decreased risk of contracting HIV. So, who would I believe, number22, or all those authorities?
It's pretty obviously non-consensual genital mutilation. Since there's no compelling health reason to do it, it's a mass crime. I'm surprised in lawsuit-happy USA, that no one has brought a lawsuit or class action based on it.
It's permanently altering someone's body without their consent. What would happen if I came up to you, pinned you to a table, and cut off some of your skin in a way that would never grow back, against your will? I'd do serious jail time.
Quote from Petsamo:
Bullshit study, eh? There are plenty of articles out there. Just Google "male circumcision cervical cancer". We have articles from Reuters, New York Times, New England Journal of Medicine, etc etc, from 2002 to 2011. In the New York Times article, they also mention the man having decreased risk of contracting HIV. So, who would I believe, number22, or all those authorities?
I read everything, but believe nothing without further studying.
There is no scientific reason that foreskin causes papillomavirus. However, it is personal choice, that high-risk sexual behaviors will increase the chance getting infected with many different viruses, not just papillomavirus. Learn to read, man.
I can't believe you call newspaper/publication a authorities? oh, you don't have once of brain, to think for yourself, and connect these dots yourself? they are your masters? Authorities? man, you are a funny retard.