I am 100% sure using 1 min is useless for me, same for monthly and quarterly graphs.
But 4h ? I don't know. I didn't really test it for a long period, so I am not sure if it could be useful or not for me.
If a real expert here could explain some advantages and not platitudes, of course I would be interested.
CM
imho its incorrect arbitrary to set the static time periods for trading
one should set the range, for example 5-130 min
within that range each and every time when trend appears the time frame should be chosen by the method at this particular moment, and while the trend develops the time frame will have to be adjusted by the method (often there are multiple trends, often in different directions, and on different time frames)
time-frames, as many other components, of the method should be dynamical, since in reality its kind of as focusing camera on the subject
time frame should be function of the trend, not the otherwise
so the same method may choose to use 15 min , next time 12 min, next time 18 min etc
we r in business of timing, and choosing correct time frames for each trend while its develops is essential

