Please screw up Obama

Quote from bigdavediode:

Pabst:

"Personally I don't have a single friend who's net worth isn't greater today (and markedly so) than in 2000. "

8-year increase in median household income in 2001: $6,000

6-year increase in median household income in 2007: negative $1,100

1. You're data is wrong.

2. Even if it wasn't wrong (but it is) what does income have to do with net worth.

My real estate value alone has tripled since 2000.

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/histinc/h01ar.html
 
Quote from bigdavediode:

Pabst:

"Personally I don't have a single friend who's net worth isn't greater today (and markedly so) than in 2000. "

8-year increase in median household income in 2001: $6,000

6-year increase in median household income in 2007: negative $1,100
I am not sure where you got these numbers from but here are some that, imo, are more relevant:

Per Capita Income, US, 1999: $21,587
Per Capita Income, US, 2005: $43,560
Per Capita Income, US, 2006: $44,970
Per Capita Income, US, 2007:$45,793

The first entry is from:
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

The middle two entries are from:
http://www.finfacts.com/biz10/globalworldincomepercapita.htm

The last entry is from
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html

All numbers are (I believe) in current USD.

Inflation for this period (1999 to 2006) has fluctuated between (approximately) 1.5% and 3.4% -- from http://www.miseryindex.us/iRbyyear.asp?StartYear=1999&EndYear=2007

That's not a bad picture, especially in a period of time with dropping tax rates, not bad at all. Don't forget that we have the largest and most technologically powerful economy in the world, at about $14Trillion per year!!
 
1. Medians aren't means

2. Average per capita income is not household income.

3. Using nonadjusted, nonconstant dollars is dishonest.

And yes, the data are correct.
 
Quote from bigdavediode:

...Using nonadjusted, nonconstant dollars is dishonest...
Why? I state it in my post and let the reader draw their own conclusions. For this reason I posted the inflation rates. You didn't have any such notation or clarification or reference in your post. Anyway, it's hard to get these data, let alone get them the way you want them. Bottom line is, we (Americans) are doing well, cheer up.
 
Quote from Yannis:

I am not sure where you got these numbers from but here are some that, imo, are more relevant:

Per Capita Income, US, 1999: $21,587
Per Capita Income, US, 2005: $43,560
Per Capita Income, US, 2006: $44,970
Per Capita Income, US, 2007:$45,793

The first entry is from:
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

The middle two entries are from:
http://www.finfacts.com/biz10/globalworldincomepercapita.htm

The last entry is from
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html

All numbers are (I believe) in current USD.

Inflation for this period (1999 to 2006) has fluctuated between (approximately) 1.5% and 3.4% -- from http://www.miseryindex.us/iRbyyear.asp?StartYear=1999&EndYear=2007

That's not a bad picture, especially in a period of time with dropping tax rates, not bad at all. Don't forget that we have the largest and most technologically powerful economy in the world, at about $14Trillion per year!!

Yannis, per capita income????

America has more millionaire living in it than the rest of the world combined.

If 10 people make an A, and 10 people make an F, what is the per capita GPA of the class??
 
Exactly. If Warren Buffet and 10 homeless guys are in a room, the average income of people in the room is a billion dollars.

That's why median is honest and mean is dishonest, non constant dollars is even more dishonest.
 
Obama is what enough people wish (Hope!) him to be. But obama is phony. He is the antithesis to integrity. He doesn't even know what patriotism means and gets away with it.
 
Quote from Almond_Dragoon:

An even better analogy would be, one person make 1,000,000 dollars, 99 people make 1000 dollars. What is the per capita income of this group?:eek:
C'mon these numbers are all pretty close, I just don't have the time or inclination to go dig them all up.

Yet, there is a difference here: some of us speak of absolute wealth of the country and some others are stuck on questions of relative wealth. The first is economics for the most part, the second borders on demagoguery.

I just don't want to live in a socialist society, that's all.
 
Back
Top