Quote from AAAintheBeltway:
A major retailer decided to give a platform to a celebrity who is best known for being a lesbian. A parents' group organized a protest. For that, they were libelled as bigots , on fox News no less.
I have a problem with people who want to throw around terms like "bigot" when people are thinking about role models for their children, etc. Don't these parents have a right to say to a retailer, "We don't approve of this. We'll take our business elsewhere." Why is that bigotry? Every major religion teaches that homosexual conduct is a serious sin. Don't people who take their religion seriously have just as much right to be offended as homosexuals? By Golderg's logic, these parents could say Penny's is bigoted against religion, which is probably fairly close to the truth.
As a business, you have a choice. You can self-identify with various groups and risk offending your customers or you can try to appeal tpo the broadest possible segment of customers. To me, it looks like JCP is taking the former route. Maybe it works for them as well as it did for TGT.
People have a right to be offended and can vote with their wallet. But asking JC Penny's to fire another person because you don't approve of their private life is not capitalism. I have no problem with conservative groups saying we will never shop there again. And they can even publicly state to make sure they are heard. That is where it ends. We don't have people fired just because we don't like them. Can we see where this could go?
And being straight is not being a good role model nor more then being gay is being a bad role model. As far as labeling anyone a bigot, I don't think others should defame people who disagree with your lifestyle. So we are in agreement there. People can believe what they want to believe and leave it at that. Calling people bigots or racists just because we don't like someone is not kosher.