Quite good hapaboy. If you're smart enough to understand me then why do you become feeble over dead children? You seem to think of them as more than human.
"Nearly Human": a good definition of me by one that disagrees with my ideals. I would refer to you as nearly logical.
You're smart enough to understand basic character traits, but tell me something I don't know. As fas I can tell I'm challenging you whilst your depth relies on my spurring insights.
Also, I may be partially delusional but only partially. Which means I'm still better than. I've received affirmation of my greatness from other greats, and from followings. Better to be a little delusional.
In one post you write that I'm "nearly human" then in another post you try to diminish me with a gimmicky statement declaring my introduction to the mainstream. Do you realize that you're doing this, (contradicting one's-self is very bad)?
You seem afraid to disclose any personal information, and any questionable opinions, without me first reassuring you that it's okay to express yourself. Traits of a follower or is this some sort of strategy?
And then you have the stupidity of blind audacity to refer to me as "nearly human." Why don't you write something that displays a superior intellect and judgement instead of relying on my breadth? Becuase I've nearly reached the bottom of the source, and you've nothing left to say, and I defeated your ideas with my first post to this thread.
You do seem afraid to divulge any personal info, and any opinion without my prompting. How else can I prove that I'm vastly superior to you?
Tell me and I shall.
I think you've nothing at all to say.
At least my egomania makes me far more interesting than your defeatist, pathetic, sentimentalizing, hypocritical, persona. You know, you can always change? Get a new personality. Only a control- freak, coward, artless person would stick with an anitquated character just to save face. In which case you're giving everyone else's opions more importance than your own.
Then again I don't know you. I know that you're scared, short-sighted, and not artistic.
Poetic hatred: better to be passionate than bland. You obviously take no responsibility for your stupidity and artlessness. A mature hapaboy, with an adult version of a teenage thought pattern.
"Nearly Human": a good definition of me by one that disagrees with my ideals. I would refer to you as nearly logical.
You're smart enough to understand basic character traits, but tell me something I don't know. As fas I can tell I'm challenging you whilst your depth relies on my spurring insights.
Also, I may be partially delusional but only partially. Which means I'm still better than. I've received affirmation of my greatness from other greats, and from followings. Better to be a little delusional.
In one post you write that I'm "nearly human" then in another post you try to diminish me with a gimmicky statement declaring my introduction to the mainstream. Do you realize that you're doing this, (contradicting one's-self is very bad)?
You seem afraid to disclose any personal information, and any questionable opinions, without me first reassuring you that it's okay to express yourself. Traits of a follower or is this some sort of strategy?
And then you have the stupidity of blind audacity to refer to me as "nearly human." Why don't you write something that displays a superior intellect and judgement instead of relying on my breadth? Becuase I've nearly reached the bottom of the source, and you've nothing left to say, and I defeated your ideas with my first post to this thread.
You do seem afraid to divulge any personal info, and any opinion without my prompting. How else can I prove that I'm vastly superior to you?
Tell me and I shall.
I think you've nothing at all to say.
At least my egomania makes me far more interesting than your defeatist, pathetic, sentimentalizing, hypocritical, persona. You know, you can always change? Get a new personality. Only a control- freak, coward, artless person would stick with an anitquated character just to save face. In which case you're giving everyone else's opions more importance than your own.
Then again I don't know you. I know that you're scared, short-sighted, and not artistic.
Poetic hatred: better to be passionate than bland. You obviously take no responsibility for your stupidity and artlessness. A mature hapaboy, with an adult version of a teenage thought pattern.
Thanks for sharing....a "must see"! Beats video games hands down!