Pimco’s Bill Gross: USA is Giant ‘Ponzi’ Scheme

Quote from schizo:
Be that as it may, he does have a point. The notion of "too big to fail" should not be used as a linchpin. Community banks should assume greater role in the future. Only way this can happen is to dissolve Federal Reserve, which is more or less made up of Wall Street firms.
I all for breaking up TBTF banks. As to the Fed being made up of Wall Street firms (more or less), that's a rather otherworldly statement.
Quote from sprstpd:
Wow your argument is so succinct that it is almost like it has no substance at all!
You noticed? There's two good reasons for this... Firstly, I can offer substance upon request and provided there's a meaningful discussion. Secondly, I have gone through this so many times already in other, older threads, I can't be bovvered to repeat the same thing over and over again without making sure that the discussion is meaningful.
 
Quote from Martinghoul:

I all for breaking up TBTF banks. As to the Fed being made up of Wall Street firms (more or less), that's a rather otherworldly statement.

I guess, with all your astute economic insights, you forgot to read between the lines. What was meant was that the Fed has strong ties to Wall Street and it would be an understatement to say that it has historically favored Wall Street banks over community banks.
 
Quote from olias:

I totally disagree, but perhaps you can turn me on to some information that would change my mind. ...I doubt it

show us information that if we would have let the banks fail the world would have ended.
 
Quote from schizo:
I guess, with all your astute economic insights, you forgot to read between the lines. What was meant was that the Fed has strong ties to Wall Street and it would be an understatement to say that it has historically favored Wall Street banks over community banks.
I try not to read between the lines, if I can help it... I don't really understand what "strong ties" and "favoring" means specifically.
 
Quote from Martinghoul:

I try not to read between the lines, if I can help it... I don't really understand what "strong ties" and "favoring" means specifically.

Au contraire. You know exactly what those words mean. Here's the list of failed banks compiled by FDIC. Note that most of them went bust after the 2007 financial meltdown. Now compare that to the number of failed banks on Wall Street, who were the receivers of billions (if not trillions) of dollars from the Fed.

http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html
 
Quote from ElCubano:

show us information that if we would have let the banks fail the world would have ended.

Have you not heard of "Great Depression"?
 
Quote from schizo:
Au contraire. You know exactly what those words mean. Here's the list of failed banks compiled by FDIC. Note that most of them went bust after the 2007 financial meltdown. Now compare that to the number of failed banks on Wall Street, who were the receivers of billions (if not trillions) of dollars from the Fed.

http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html
From the govt, you mean? How much came from the US Treasury, as opposed to the Fed?

In terms of comparing, using numbers is obviously meaningless, given the different sizes of the two samples. Shouldn't you be comparing the total assets held by the failed institutions in the two categories? Or maybe what percentage of the two sets of banks failed, respectively?
 
And if the government gets its hands on the Health Care Industry the same thing will happen to the funds collected for health care. It will be used for fighting wars or for other special interest projects. Health Care will be paid for by deficit spending, which puts us all on the hook for the debt.

The US government has proven time and time again that the answer to any budget short fall is massive debt.

Quote from PocketChange:

Social Security is a mandatory federally run insurance program.
The program should serve as a model for those interested in implementing a single payer federally run health plan.

The Social security trust fund has become a federal slush fund... The core program is self sufficient and strong if not for the politician's special interest money grab.
 
Quote from schizo:

Have you not heard of "Great Depression"?

perhaps the reason we are in this boat is because of this "TOO BIG TO FAIL". If they werent too big to fail they wouldnt have taken absurd risks.

too bad lehman and bear weren't too big to fail? or were they?
 
Quote from Martinghoul:

From the govt, you mean? How much came from the US Treasury, as opposed to the Fed?

Does it make any difference when the Fed is the largest holder of U.S. debt? Fed is the US Treasury for all I know.

(Source: http://www.dailypaul.com/156292/federal-reserve-passes-china-now-biggest-holder-of-us-debt)

In terms of comparing, using numbers is obviously meaningless, given the different sizes of the two samples. Shouldn't you be comparing the total assets held by the failed institutions in the two categories? Or maybe what percentage of the two sets of banks failed, respectively?


One important point not to be overlooked: Fed Names Recipients of $3.3 Trillion in Crisis Aid

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-...llion-of-aid-during-u-s-financial-crisis.html

See for yourself who got the major windfall of the Fed's assistance.
 
Back
Top