PIMCO on Floor Vs. Screen

Quote from bone:

Nitro: You're a good man.

Maverick: Got your GED yet? The spelling, the grammatics... it's bad. Really bad. I'm sure you're intelligent. Just take your time.

You didn't answer my question. I take it you don't have the answer or its not an inteligent one.
 
Quote from bone:

http://www.futuresindustry.org/fimagazi-1929.asp?a=784

Please check this out. Excellent perspective on why the Chicago exchanges had better stop splitting liquidity... the clowns are going to give away the circus, especially when Eurex offers US derivative products.

Great article. Great thread!(best in awhile)


Personally I don't care who wins the battle of the exchanges. Just as long as my slippage keeps getting reduced:)
 
Since GE's beta is approximately 1, a "dollar neutral spread" would be about 12000 shares of GE per 250 ES. However, something tells me that you are long "only" about 8500 GE shares per 250 ES contracts.

What is the actual number of long GE shares?

nitro
 
Quote from jaming5002:




As for pit traders making a market your wrong. Brokers often yell at the pit for a market (i.e, "cmon, give me a fu*!n market" ) when it's needed, especially if something like sept. 11 happens. The difference is locals can't hide or turn off their screens and phones. They have to face the pit and brokers.

nope sorry dude your WAY wrong......Yes the PHONE JOCKEYS may yell at their clerks for a quote(with the customer listening), but that dosent mean squat during a event, . Ive been on BOTH sides and know a local will not let himself get intimidated into doing ANYTHING.
 
Quote from cheeks:



If the spoos pit is always there to provide liquidity, what happened to Soro's order on Thurs morning 10/22/87.

The screen is not the only place the bids get pulled.
Quote from jaming5002:



Familiar with efficient markets? Size affects prices in efficient markets. Also, wasn't Soros' broker to blame for screwing up his order?

ALL I am saying is that bids get pulled in the pits too. This argument that the pit is ALWAYS there to provide liquidity is ridiculous.
 
CdnTrader: Amen, Brother: you have distilled the entire arguement into it's simplest form.

Maverick: I hit the bid at 10:20 am CST. Got it all done at one price. It was at the quoted price in the pit - yeah, I have a squawk box clerk on the floor. I almost always "give up the edge" to get into a trade and to take a loser. I almost always wait to get hit or lifted to take a profit. In the Note Pits, I never offered Notes if I was Bullish Yield Curve. Never. With headsets, the tiering on the new financial floor at the CBOT, and automated order routing - the pits have become too efficient for locals to buy bids and sell offers in Chicago. As soon as you get them, they're bad. If you trade size, you've got a giant bullseye on your forehead. Locals can still make money - but in the pits with split liquidity it's really become difficult.

As far as the S&Ps go, I know the size institutions. MS and REFCO go where the size is, and they go both places at once. Coreography in motion. Splitting the liquidity is bad and the size traders hate it.

MAVERICK, I'M GOING TO SAY THIS ONLY ONCE. IN THE PIT, ALL THE LOCALS PUT THEIR HANDS DOWN AS SOON AS ONE OF THEIR OWN GETS LOADED UP. AND THEN THEY TURN ON HIM. AND ANOTHER THING - WHEN THEY REALIZE THE PAPER IS GOING TO MARKET, THEY RACE THE BROKER. I REPEAT, THEY RACE THE BROKER. LOCALS WANT THE GOLDEN LAYUP (LIKE ON FRIDAY, A BROKER QUIETLY WANTING TO BUY FROM HIM AT MARKET). AND ITS GETTING HARDER TO COME BY.

With the screen, what you see is what you get.

Besides, the Genie is out of the bottle and the cork won't go back in.

Listen, boys, it's all about minimizing the slippage and the parasites.
 
Gawd, I'm being stalked. So glad I'm flat. Nitro would make me squeal like a pig Monday with his index arbitrage squeeze on me.
 
Back
Top