Quote from achilles28:
Clearly QE works to stabilize equity markets and employment, at least in the short term. Otherwise, the recent sell-off/lay-offs since the end of QE2 (July) wouldn't have occurred. Nor would the V-bottom reversal of 2008 occurred without unprecedented FED intervention. I would say to the contrary, our fundamental economic problems are related to money supply and demand driven credit. The private sector is in the middle of a giant deleveraging cycle which killed loan demand and created huge deflationary pressures in asset markets. The Government and FED stepped in to offset private sector deleveraging with massive deficits and QE. I'm not arguing the case for additional quantitative easing. It's a band-aid, and an effective band-aid at that (depending on perspective). I'm merely arguing the merits of that quote. Like most people here, I would love to see the end of all QE, deficits and take the pain. But honestly, look at Bernackes track record. He's 1000% opposed to any deflation. In his mind, deflation is the number#1 threat to stability. He's a total dove, owned by Wallstreet. The only leverage Washington has is his Chairmenship comes up for renewal in 2014. Does anyone here think voters prefer 30% unemployment over high gas prices...? Didn't the recent debt deal prove that? Americans overwhelming supported bipartisan compromise to increase the debt ceiling, despite widespread opposition and outrage against an even higher national debt. When confronted with a meltdown scenario, Americans chose their handouts and jobs over principle. Everyone loves to rail against the debt, as long as doing something about doesn't effect them. Nobody wants to take the pain. The politicians know this and will act accordingly, imo.