Piers Morgan Blows Up on Larry Pratt Over Gun Rights

Quote from achilles28:

You'd be surprised. Guerrilla warfare is impossible to win. The "insurgents" were never beat in Afghanistan or Iraq, 10 years later. Even against all the high-tech gadgetry and smart bombs the US military brought to bare. Remember Vietnam? To quote that Bruce Willis movie, the military is a broad sword. It's effective at carpet bombing and reducing entire civilizations to rubble. It's not effective at going house-to-house and sussing out enemies that pop out of the woodwork, then blend back in.

The only way for the US military to "win" a confrontation with the American people (and that's a long shot, as legions of Constitutionals still serve all along the chain of command), would be an all out assault. Carpet bombs etc. In that case, the entire nation would likely turn against the military. They can only go house to house to keep a lid on the rebellion. And even that, they'll lose. Doesn't mean a shitload of Americans won't get killed.

As far as all this happening and the likelihood, Obama not only signed - but pressured Congress to write - a bill that allows the US military to round up and lock up citizens indefinitely, with no lawyer, trial, or due process. So you tell me again, this is all far fetched.

The Founders put the 2nd Amendment in the Constitution because they were students of history. These motherfucking Caesars rise up every 50 years or so, and try to take over with force. They knew it could just easily happen in America, as it had overseas, so we got the second amendment to stop these bitches in their tracks.

Absolutely G D right!
 
Leeds and Manchester had to arm their patrols also. All the video cameras, video patrol vans, and other nanny measures were not enough to stop the gun crimes when only the criminals have guns in the U.k.

Quote from Lucrum:

London police recently start ARMED patrols in certain sections of the city, because of gun violence.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/armed-police-to-permanently-patrol-britains-streets-6776867.html


"Armed police to permanently patrol Britain's streets
Armed police will permanently patrol in Brixton, Haringey and Tottenham
inShare

Martin Bentham
22 October 2009

Armed police are to carry out routine patrols in London to combat gun carrying drug gangs.

In an unprecedented move for British policing a team of 18 constables armed with sub-machineguns, led by an inspector and two sergeants, will operate permanently in "hotspots" in Brixton, Haringey and Tottenham...
 
I think we should require every newborn to purchase a handgun within their first 30 days. The earlier we can get our citizens to learn responsible gun ownership, the better.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

I want RCG to to do the TST combine he agreed to.

I want mrbill to stop pretending to be a centrist and coming back with a new alias every few months.

I want all these recent sock puppets of former ET liberals to go away or admit who they are.

I want those here not interested in trading to find another web site to pollute

I want you to stop shilling for the democrats and Obama

I want to make passionate love to Kate Upton





Its now on record that you have welched on a bet you agreed to with your word and integrity.



Quote from Lucrum:

You win, I owe you 30 days.
 
Quote from pspr:

It would be funny if you got the alias "IQ Forty Seven" and used that for 30 days to beat AK over the head with it.




Its even funnier reading your previous posts




Quote from pspr:
I think AK may be right.
When Obama doesn't even get 200 electoral votes it's going to look like unskewedpolls.com was wrong saying he will get 217.


Quote from pspr:

My personal feeling is that they will NOT uphold the insurance mandate in ObamaCare



Quote from pspr:

Liberals everywhere are acclimating themselves to the fact that Obama is toast and Romney is going to be the next President.


Quote from pspr:



Regardless, it will be interesting to see if the judge decides to keep Obama off the ballot. I don't see how he can rule any other way.





Quote from pspr:



I'm still waiting for Obama's October surprise but the pollsters may be doing the democrat oversampling on purpose so his supporters don't see how bad he's really doing and don't pressure him to make something happen.


Quote from pspr:

The race hasn't even started yet. As mentioned in the analysis, "these polls will change". Other polls show just the opposite so it's better for people, at this stage, to be concerned you are behind than to get too confident in April.

Besides, we have all these and other shockers to come:

The Holder Contempt Trial
The Occupy Riots
The Black Riots
The Obama Historical Movie
More BC Revelations
The Summer Economic Slump
Possible Stubbornly High Gas Prices
Possible Stumbles in The Debates (Obama doesn't do good without a teleprompter)
Possible Inflation taking hold
October Surprises



Quote from pspr:

This is just sad.

I'm hoping "Fast And Furious" will turn out to be Obama's "Watergate". If we can get him out of the White House Biden will be inept and won't do more damage. Obama has more damage planned for the economy if he stays for another 18 months.




Quote from pspr:

I think they (Arabs, Palestinians and Obama) are trying to box Israel into a corner. Of course the Arabs would just love for Israel to defend itself and have the U.S. on the other side. This could be Obama's Watergate (or Waterloo).





Quote from pspr:

At least until we get to the October Marshall Law event. I've noticed even the Weather Service and the Social Security Administration are ordering tens of thousands of hollow point pistol rounds and the military has written a manual on dealing with civil disobedience.



Quote from pspr:



Then there is the October surprise. Israel attack on Iran, Obama military action somewhere, Obama push at civil disobedience, polling intimidation, etc. I don't know what, but if Obama is behind Romney in Ocotober he is going to do something shocking.




Quote from pspr:



I'm still waiting to see what the Obama manufactured event/crisis is going to be that supposedly will unite the country behind him in October. A failed (staged) assassination attempt would probably do it.




Quote from pspr:

Could this be how Obama tries to rally the country behind him before election day?

Possibility 1)
Picture the next and final debate on foreign policy. Midway through the debate a uniformed Army Officer walks out on the stage and whispers something in the President's ear. Moments later Obama announces to the nation that he is going to suspend the rest of the debate and make an announcement to the American people. Romney is ushered out of the room by the Secret Service.

The podium is transformed in seconds with the Shield of The President and teleprompter screens positioned on each side.

Obama proceeds to make a 60 minute pre-planned announcement that the attackers of the Libyan Consulate have been brought to justice and taken out by U.S. armed drones. He then precedes to outline in detail how his conflicting statements on Libya were designed to keep the terrorists off balance while they were being identified and located so they could be eliminated.
-----
Possibility 2)
During the debate a shot rings out and the President clutches his shoulder and falls to the ground. The perp (put up to the deed by the Obama Campaign) has fired a blank round but a device under the president's jacket has imparted a shallow wound to his shoulder.

The perp is hauled off to an undisclosed location and after treatment Obama says he will continue the debate with his right arm now in a sling and bandages apparent under his jacket.
-----
Either of these possibilities could throw a big monkey wrench into this election.
 
Quote from L-Kabong:

I think we should require every newborn to purchase a handgun within their first 30 days. The earlier we can get our citizens to learn responsible gun ownership, the better.

I agree. Back in the old days, kids ages 7-9 would go out hunting themselves (with guns), and even bring their guns to school, for school-sponsored hunting clubs. Put them right in their lockers. Get them while their young +1
 
Quote from L-Kabong:

I think we should require every newborn to purchase a handgun within their first 30 days. The earlier we can get our citizens to learn responsible gun ownership, the better.

Is this the best unrealistic extreme you could come up with to rationalize your anti gun ideology?
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Its now on record that you have welched on a bet you agreed to with your word and integrity.

Did you really expect anything else?
 
Back
Top