Pick your poison, social unrest, or...

a return to pre-Reagan tax rates?

Harlan Green
Editor and Publisher, PopularEconomics.com

Who Is Most Scared of Inequality?
Posted: 08/13/2015 9:49 am EDT

"The average annual rate of productivity growth from 2007 to 2014 was revised down to 1.3 percent per year from the prior estimate of 1.4 percent, the Labor Department said Tuesday. This is well below the long-term rate of 2.2 percent per year from 1947 to 2014.

"This is at the same time that record income inequality has impoverished so many on Main Street today. And some among the wealthiest One Percent are becoming alarmed at the inequality, the worst since 1929 and the Great Depression, and the consequent loss in productivity.

"Peter Georgescu, Chairman Emeritus of ad giant Young & Rubicom and some of his hedge fund colleagues say they are.

"I'M scared'" says Georgescu in a recent New York Times Op-ed. "The billionaire hedge funder Paul Tudor Jones is scared. My friend Ken Langone, a founder of the Home Depot, is scared. So are many other chief executives. Not of Al Qaeda, or the vicious Islamic State or some other evolving radical group from the Middle East, Africa or Asia. We are afraid where income inequality will lead."

"Where might it lead? "If inequality is not addressed, the income gap will most likely be resolved in one of two ways: by major social unrest or through oppressive taxes, such as the 80 percent tax rate on income over $500,000 suggested by Thomas Piketty, the French economist and author of the best-selling book "Capital in the Twenty-First Century."

"The result of such a maldisribution of wealth has been slumping economic growth, as less has been invested in productive enterprises that would increase the output of workers, and more hoarded by corporations and Wall Street that have record amounts of cash holdings.

"U.S Corporations have some $4.5 trillion in cash and liquid reserves here and overseas, according to the St. Louis Fed, not being used productively . U.S. Banks still hold close to $1 trillion in excess reserves with the Fed in MZM accounts earning no interest."

More >>


When your customers are broke, you can't make sales.
 
Personally, I like the idea of social unrest better - as it will cleanse the political caste as well.

Higher taxes will only delay the reckoning anyway, and the corrupt and bloated system will continue.
 
why not just go to 100% and let the government pay anybody who threatens to become restive? Then I can just hear it, "We need to go down to at least 90% so the people have a little money in their pocket to spend to get this economy rolling again."
 
Personally, I like the idea of social unrest better - as it will cleanse the political caste as well.
You assume you and your family will get through it unscathed? In a reasonable time period? That something better will necessarily replace our political caste? If you consider history, those assumptions are quite the gamble imo.
 
we need to organize the poor. Now that would be one strong union. When they go on strike, they just loot if you don't meet their demands.
 
we need to organize the poor. Now that would be one strong union. When they go on strike, they just loot if you don't meet their demands.

So where are they going to go back to work to after they loot all the stores and businesses?

Do you really think the boss would hire the looters back? IMO most would prefer to go out of business instead of hiring looters.
 
You assume you and your family will get through it unscathed? In a reasonable time period? That something better will necessarily replace our political caste? If you consider history, those assumptions are quite the gamble imo.

Oh no, we won't get through economically unscathed (though the mountain home will be stocked to shelter).

But I am a LOT more prepared for this than most. And a cleansing of the political caste can only come from an uprising.
 
What's the problem? It's the best time ever from a poverty perspective...

roser_poverty_shares.png-large


http://www.vox.com/2015/8/13/9145467/extreme-poverty-global-poverty
 
Ricter,

Why didn't you put a poll with this?

I pick "social unrest".

Or, lets go back to pre Reagan tax rates AND tax write offs :)
 
how about no taxes and plenty of money for the poor and the federal reserve cease printing money for private accounts and only prints it to pay the Sovereigns bills? There may not be any inflation... depending on how much the Fed has been creating for its cronies and itself and the past and the growth of the world economy.

Its not an either or.

If you really wish to benefit the poor its lower or no taxes and better govt with better choices on how its spends the money.
 
Back
Top