Physics proves the earth is only thousands of years old.

[peilthetraveler]

Dr. Thomas Barnes, Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of Texas at El Paso, has published the definitive work in this field. Scientific observations since 1829 have shown that the earth's magnetic field has been measurably decaying at an exponential rate, demonstrating its half-life to be approximately 1,400 years. In practical application its strength 20,000 years ago would approximate that of a magnetic star. Under those conditions many of the atoms necessary for life processes could not form. These data demonstrate that earth's entire history is young, within a few thousand of years.


http://www.icr.org/article/215/


So...i guess its game over for evolutionists. I mean if this is proof that the earth is thousands of years old, they will have to come up with a new theory to kill God.

Once people start accepting the EVIDENCE of physics, they will realize that they have been duped their whole lives. I wonder what Vhehn and his ilk will do when they know for sure that the earth is 1000s of years old.

 

[peilthetraveler]

In case physics isnt enough evidence for you, here is some mathmatical evidence.

World population growth rate in recent times is about 2% per year. Practicable application of growth rate throughout human history would be about half that number. Wars, disease, famine, etc. have wiped out approximately one third of the population on average every 82 years. Starting with eight people, and applying these growth rates since the Flood of Noah's day (about 4500 years ago) would give a total human population at just under six billion people. However, application on an evolutionary time scale runs into major difficulties. Starting with one "couple" just 41,000 years ago would give us a total population of 2 x 10 to the 89th power. The universe does not have space to hold so many bodies.


Want more EVIDENCE?

Physicist Robert Gentry has reported isolated radio halos of polonuim-214 in crystalline granite. The half-life of this element is 0.000164 seconds! To record the existence of this element in such short time span, the granite must be in crystalline state instantaneously.This runs counter to evolutionary estimates of 300 million years for granite to form.

 

[peilthetraveler]

No responses, yet i've already been one starred by the atheists. That was quick.

 

[morganist]

Quote from peilthetraveler:

No responses, yet i've already been one starred by the atheists. That was quick.

it takes a while to read. good post i sent you a pm.

 

[unretired]

Quote from peilthetraveler:

Dr. Thomas Barnes, Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of Texas at El Paso, has published the definitive work in this field. Scientific observations since 1829 have shown that the earth's magnetic field has been measurably decaying at an exponential rate, demonstrating its half-life to be approximately 1,400 years. In practical application its strength 20,000 years ago would approximate that of a magnetic star. Under those conditions many of the atoms necessary for life processes could not form. These data demonstrate that earth's entire history is young, within a few thousand of years.


http://www.icr.org/article/215/


So...i guess its game over for evolutionists. I mean if this is proof that the earth is thousands of years old, they will have to come up with a new theory to kill God.

Once people start accepting the EVIDENCE of physics, they will realize that they have been duped their whole lives. I wonder what Vhehn and his ilk will do when they know for sure that the earth is 1000s of years old.

I would have figured that we were dead on with the Biblical time frame ... of about 6000 years or so. (As I recall)

 

[Gabfly1]

Barnes' scientific arguments are considered to be pseudoscience or fringe science, appearing in non-mainstream, non-peer-reviewed sources like Galilean Electrodynamics and Creation Research Society Quarterly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_G._Barnes

What else you got?

 

[peilthetraveler]

Usually I get at least one non-believer to write something by now. They must be really scrambling to find some way to give a rebuttal. Of course if they cant find one, they will just go to their usual tactic of changing the subject. Maybe even mention the flying spaghetti monster. (they love that one!)

 

[morganist]

Quote from Gabfly1:

Barnes' scientific arguments are considered to be pseudoscience or fringe science, appearing in non-mainstream, non-peer-reviewed sources like Galilean Electrodynamics and Creation Research Society Quarterly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_G._Barnes

What else you got?

i did a couple of threads in intelligence and music and question a divine guiding hand. did you read them. are they useful.

 

[OPTIONAL777]

Huh...why didn't Jesus talk about dinosaurs?

 

[morganist]

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Huh...why didn't Jesus talk about dinosaurs?

why didn't he talk about dogs.