Pfizer leak

so for the last 48 hours you switched from Infectious disease expert to an Employment Law Lawyer, a Drug Tech and intellectual Property expert attorney and a Contract Law Treatise author?

Really... how many drug distribution agreements have you drafted and revised or negotiated?
 
jem said:
so for the last 48 hours you switched from Infectious disease expert to an Employment Law Lawyer, a Drug Tech and intellectual Property expert attorney and a Contract Law Treatise author?

Really... how many drug distribution agreements have you drafted and revised or negotiated?
More...

Facts don't matter to you -- only COVID-denier hysteria matters to you.

Sadly documented facts matter. Trying to couple what the Twitter poster admits is a standard vaccine manufacturing & supply template used in all transactions --- to being coupled with Ivermectin being "suppressed" is absurd.

Ivermectin is just the latest hydroxychloroquine being pushed by COVID-denier pimps.

Let's see what the manufacturer of Ivermectin, Merck, has to say about it being used to treat COVID-19.

Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

KENILWORTH, N.J., Feb. 4, 2021 – Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today affirmed its position regarding use of ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic. Company scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety. It is important to note that, to-date, our analysis has identified:
  • No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies;
  • No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and;
  • A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.
We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information.
 
what a douchebag you are...
I have not said anything about ivermectin in weeks... maybe ever.
I do not know much about ivermectin... and my critique of your bullshit had nothing to do with that...

I was commenting on your bullshit and lies about stating that was a standard drug distribution agreement...

how would know that? there is a less than 1 percent chance you could know that given that you claim to be a computer tech person... and manifest zero understanding of nuance when it comes to the law.

gwb-trading said:
Facts don't matter to you -- only COVID-denier hysteria matters to you.

Sadly documented facts matter. Trying to couple what the Twitter poster admits is a standard vaccine manufacturing & supply template used in all transactions --- to being coupled with Ivermectin being "suppressed" is absurd.

Ivermectin is just the latest hydroxychloroquine being pushed by COVID-denier pimps.

Let's see what the manufacturer of Ivermectin, Merck, has to say about it being used to treat COVID-19.

Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

KENILWORTH, N.J., Feb. 4, 2021 – Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today affirmed its position regarding use of ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic. Company scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety. It is important to note that, to-date, our analysis has identified:
  • No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies;
  • No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and;
  • A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.
We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information.
More...
 
gwb-trading said:
Facts don't matter to you -- only COVID-denier hysteria matters to you.

Sadly documented facts matter. Trying to couple what the Twitter poster admits is a standard vaccine manufacturing & supply template used in all transactions --- to being coupled with Ivermectin being "suppressed" is absurd.

Ivermectin is just the latest hydroxychloroquine being pushed by COVID-denier pimps.

Let's see what the manufacturer of Ivermectin, Merck, has to say about it being used to treat COVID-19.

Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

KENILWORTH, N.J., Feb. 4, 2021 – Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today affirmed its position regarding use of ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic. Company scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety. It is important to note that, to-date, our analysis has identified:
  • No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies;
  • No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and;
  • A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.
We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information.
More...
Hmmm, wonder if Merck is working on new drugs to treat covid?
https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coron...-merck-s-experimental-covid-19-drug-1.5462812
Fucking moron.
 
gwb-trading said:
This is just a standard distribution agreement for a pharma company for any drug or vaccine. The wild claims in the Twitter thread trying to link it to Ivermectin being "suppressed" , etc. are simply absurd.
More...
Keep reading retard.
 
jem said:
what a douchebag you are...
I have not said anything about ivermectin in weeks... maybe ever.
I do not know much about ivermectin... and my critique of your bullshit had nothing to do with that...

I was commenting on your bullshit and lies about stating that was a standard drug distribution agreement...

how would know that? there is a less than 1 percent chance you could know that given that you claim to be a computer tech person... and manifest zero understanding of nuance when it comes to the law.
More...

This ET thread is based on an entire Twitter thread dedicated to that the Pfizer contract is proof that Ivermectin is being "suppressed" -- -and the best you can come up is "I do not know much about ivermectin".

I am pointing out the claims made in the Twitter thread are entirely false.

I should also point out that this Pfizer contract was leaked months ago. This is not new information. This Twitter clown is merely re-cycling it to push his COVID-denier bullshiat about Ivermectin & other items.
 
so you agree you know nothing about drug distribution agreements and had no business making that declaration.


gwb-trading said:
This ET thread is based on an entire Twitter thread dedicated to that the Pfizer contract is proof that Ivermectin is being "suppressed" -- -and the best you can come up is "I do not know much about ivermectin".

I am pointing out the claims made in the Twitter thread are entirely false.

I should also point out that this Pfizer contract was leaked months ago. This is not new information. This Twitter clown is merely re-cycling it to push his COVID-denier bullshiat about Ivermectin & other items.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top