Quote from PiggyBank:
Don't know if I agree here. It is true that we don't know his positions, but he didn't make the calls on the war. His job is to do what it takes to win so I think it is unfair criticism of him to say he is for endless wars. He has proven himself a capable leader in the military, and since defense is the fed govts primary responsibility, I would feel comfortable if he had to step in as Pres.
that being said, right now the economy is the focus, but I don't think a VP choice should simply be whoever will help you win the race, that is a bit shortsighted imo. The only people who would instantly be put off to the ticket because of his inclusion are the same people who called him General Betrayus. Fuck those losers anyway, Romney isn't getting their vote no matter what.
Why don't you like him as VP, just out of curiosity?
Look, if he was VP and had to step in as President, I agree that we could do a lot worse. Obama for example. But that's a pretty low bar.
My objections would be that one, he's never run for elective office. I don't think President or even VP are starter jobs in politics. A senior general and head of the CIA has to be politically savvy, but that's a lot different from running for office.
Two, I don't know his position on any issue, which is a pretty big problem. Some of them could be problematic. Gays in the military? Abortion? Tax policy? Immigration? It was a problem with Condi, it was a problem with Colin Powell and it could be a problem with this guy. After all, he is currently serving in the most leftwing administration in history. The fact he could stomach that raises a big red flag for me.
Finally, I generally don't like the idea of retired generals being president. It undermines the concept of civilian control of the military. We had one retired general, Ike, in the modern era, and I would say he was mediocre at best. He did nothing to dismantle FDR's welfare state and he appointed the worst Supreme Court justice in history, Earl Warren.
From a political perspective, I fail to see what Petraeus would add over any one of a half dozen other capable candidates, except maybe name recognition. He would bring the whole issue of Iraq and afghanistan into play, which doesn't help Romney in my mind. I would expect him to be in favor of staying in afghanistan and "finishing the job", which is a total disaster of an idea in my mind.
I can't see him helping Romney with women voters either. Soccer moms see the military now as a place where women are routinely assaulted and then it is covered up by higher up officers.
I know a lot of neo-cons are panting over his name, but count me out.