Peter Strzok shits on latest nothing burger

[WeToddDid2]

they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Her emails were too secret to even name the agency that owned the intel.

 

[Slartibartfast]

they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Her emails were too secret to even name the agency that owned the intel.

It is bollocks.

Have some self respect and think for a moment, what was Gohmert up to?

Exactly this.

Rep. Louie Gohmert attends the Peter Strzok hearing, makes a funny face.


Gohmert does not want a reply, he just wants to drop propaganda for right wing media. This is all Hillary email server shit being regurgitated like the endless Benghazi travesty.

Gohmert says 'well that will come out. muffle.."

When will it come out? Emails to a foreign entity nobody raised before?

 

[Poindexter]

It is bollocks.

Have some self respect and think for a moment, what was Gohmert up to?

Exactly this.


Rep. Louie Gohmert attends the Peter Strzok hearing, makes a funny face.


Gohmert does not want a reply, he just wants to drop propaganda for right wing media. This is all Hillary email server shit being regurgitated like the endless Benghazi travesty.

Gohmert says 'well that will come out. muffle.."

When will it come out? Emails to a foreign entity nobody raised before?

Dude, stick to paper trading.

The ICIG's findings haven't been publicly released so while we don't know for sure, your assertion is based on nothing but hot air.

OTOH a strong case can be made that what Gohmert said is true:

1. Gohmert was very specific about details... names, what was said, all emails affected but four, etc.

2. Strozk didn't deny any of it; he only claimed he couldn't recall, just like he claimed he couldn't remember writing his most damning texts.

3. None of the demrats in the hearing denied what Gohmert said, nor has anyone come out since with a factual rebuttal.

4. The leftist media hasn't covered it, which is their modus operandi for unfavorable information of this sort (when they think they can get with it).

5. Even ignoring 1 -- 4 above, if this didn't happen, it would be a miracle.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Dude, stick to paper trading.

The ICIG's findings haven't been publicly released so while this is speculation, your assertion is based on nothing but hot air.

OTOH a strong case can be made that what Gohmert said is true:

1. Gohmert was very specific about details... names, what was said, all emails affected but four, etc.

2. Strozk didn't deny any of it; he only claimed he couldn't recall, just like he claimed he couldn't remember writing his most damning texts.

3. None of the demrats in the hearing denied what Gohmert said, nor has anyone come out since with a factual rebuttal.

4. The leftist media hasn't covered it, which is their modus operandi for unfavorable information of this sort (when they think they can get with it).

5. Even ignoring 1 -- 4 above, if this didn't happen, it would be a miracle.

View attachment 188578

Ok, just for a change of pace, lets look in detail at this.

Your point 2 to start.

"2. Strozk didn't deny any of it; he only claimed he couldn't recall, just like he claimed he couldn't remember writing his most damning texts."

Can you paste here the full exchange between these two to prove "Strozk didn't deny any of it". It is all on video.

 

[Slartibartfast]

What is wrong @Poindexter ? can't you find the Strozk/Gohmert discussion to the end? I know it is not included on Gohmert's site, nor any right-wing media I can see but it is there.

 

[Poindexter]

What is wrong @Poindexter ? can't you find the Strozk/Gohmert discussion to the end? I know it is not included on Gohmert's site, nor any right-wing media I can see but it is there.

Apparently you have reading comprehension issues because I've already supported my case.

If you want to claim that he took all this back, then you show me.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Apparently you have reading comprehension issues because I've already supported my case.

If you want to claim that he took all this back, then you show me.

View attachment 188580

Not playing a game here, I just want you to show there was more to this exchange than the truncated section on all right wing media I have seen.

Have you watched the exchange in video between those two until the end and things move on?

If so can you please paste a source of the whole exchange to show us you are being honest? That there was no denial?

 

[Slartibartfast]

 

[Slartibartfast]

@Poindexter, no answer?

You don't want people to think you are Pinocchiodexter making hit and runs with false information do you?

 

[Slartibartfast]

@Poindexter still has no response.