If there was any evidence whatsoever, we would know about it. 'Wishing for' evidence is not the same as 'having' evidence. Your guys TDS has really affected your ability to think objectively, imo.
This was UsualName's post :
" Trump is being investigated because he was up to his eyeballs in Russian sympathizers in his campaign while Russia itself was actively working to get him elected."
You responded like a hermit whose been living in the trees the past two years:
"
If there was any evidence whatsoever, we would know about it. 'Wishing for' evidence is not the same as 'having' evidence. Your guys TDS has really affected your ability to think objectively, imo."
To which I'll add that if you think no evidence is needed by a Grand Jury to bring an indictment, you are even more dense than I thought.
Eleven Russians have already been indicted for interfering in the 2016 election!
Trump has not been indicted yet! But he has surrounded himself with those who have , and five of these folks have already pleaded guilty to various crimes and civil offenses. You and I have no knowledge of the evidence Mueller has against Trump himself.
And contrary to what you stated, you wouldn't know about it. But unlike you, I am not stupid. Mr. Trump's crimes,
at a minimum, will be tax evasion and money laundering -- for the latter there is a mountain of publicly available evidence has high as Everest.. He may also be indicted in New York after he is out of office. If Mueller subpoenas him, I will be able to add perjury to his other offenses.
Trump has surrounded himself with criminals from Putin on down. Among those, there have been at least 20 indictments (I think it may actually be 23) and 5 guilty pleas, so far. Those folks are either already singing like canaries, or soon will be. Trump can't pardon them because they would lose their 5th amendment privilege and have to testify or be jailed in contempt of court. Why do you think Trump hasn't pardoned them before now? And he is not going to. No President will pardon someone who has information that could put them in jail.
The Congress won't need any of Mueller's charges to impeach and convict trump of high crimes and misdemeanors. They can easily get rid of him for violations of the Emollients Clause in the Constitution, which in Trumps case is a trivial matter to prove.