The link to perpetual motion in the inital posting has unfortunately a bug.
The correct link is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
But when I talk of perpetual motion, then for me a machine running 1000 years is just very fine,
but not so for the theoretical idiots out there in the sciences etc.
They mean it has to run forever, otherwise it's worth nothing...
IMO that's sicko thinking!...
They should know that it never can be fullfilled b/c the universe had a beginning and has an end, so nothing can last any longer than the universe itself.
But as said just a fraction of the current age of the universe, say just 1%, is more than enough, as it would mean more than 138 millions of years the machine runs...
The correct link is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
But when I talk of perpetual motion, then for me a machine running 1000 years is just very fine,
but not so for the theoretical idiots out there in the sciences etc.
They mean it has to run forever, otherwise it's worth nothing...
IMO that's sicko thinking!...They should know that it never can be fullfilled b/c the universe had a beginning and has an end, so nothing can last any longer than the universe itself.
But as said just a fraction of the current age of the universe, say just 1%, is more than enough, as it would mean more than 138 millions of years the machine runs...

Last edited: