Quote from ScalperJoe:
I agree with your logic, however I'm still trying to differentiate between corrective wave patterns within the context of the larger timeframes.
If the original Elliott Wave count began with the October 2011 lows, my understanding was the wave count remains intact so long as the TOP of Wave isn't breached, which from a closing basis it wasn't (as of Friday).
In other words, could it still be a valid "ABC" corrective pattern, whereby 1,422 is still the top of Wave [III]?
ScalperJoe - It could be that case because the market stopped right above the 50% fib retracement. If that 50% area holds, we don't rule out the possibility of the wave [IV] scenario, which means that the market would come back to test 1400 area for a wave [V].
