People Disgusted by Body Odour More Likely to Be Right Wing

Optionpro007

Optionpro007

People Disgusted by Body Odour More Likely to Be Right Wing
267

Donald-Trump-Fragrance-640x480.png

Scott Harrison/Getty Images

by VICTORIA FRIEDMAN1 Mar 2018877

A study has found that the more a person is revolted by the smell of body odour and urine the more likely they are to be right wing and want to secure national borders.
Research conducted by the University of Stockholm, Sweden, also found that left-wingers were less revolted by bad personal hygiene, reports MailOnline.

Psychologists believe that it represents a deep-rooted “defence mechanism” against contagious diseases.

Indeed, a Royal Society paper proposed in 2011 that disgust “evolved to motivate infectious disease avoidance”.


The study’s author, Dr. Jonas Olofsson, said: “There was a solid connection between how strongly someone was disgusted by smells and their desire to have a dictator-like leader who can suppress radical protest movements and ensure that different groups ‘stay in their places’.

“That type of society reduces contact among different groups and, at least in theory, decreases the chance of becoming ill.”

https://twitter.com/BreitbartLondon/status/856854054319792128
Breitbart London@BreitbartLondon

Seems centrists have the least interesting love lives of all http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/04/25/study-far-left-right-likely-extreme-sex/ …

7:55 AM - Apr 25, 2017

Far-Left Voters More Likely to Share Their Wives, Right Wingers More Sexually Dominant, Claims Study
People on the political spectrum's far left and right are more likely to engage in “extreme” sexual practices, according to a French study.

breitbart.com
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Researchers theorise a correlation between how test subjects wanted the world to be ordered and the rates of levels of disgust to bad breath, smelly feet, urine, faeces, sweat, and flatulence.

The more a person disliked bad smells, the greater they agreed with statements such as the need to trust “the proper authorities”, need a “mighty leader”, and want to ignore “noisy rabble-rousers”.

The paper, published in the Royal Society Open Science journal, also details that in a further experiment those who expressed greater aversion to bad smells were more likely to have supported Donald Trump than Hillary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Studies published last year on the characteristics of political polar opposites found that attractive people were more likely be conservative and another found that socialists are more likely to be physically weak.
 
I see. Another sign that Trump is a lefty then because he allegedly pays ruskie prostitutes to pee on him. We know this because the dossier says so and if it were not true, it would not be in the dossier, eh?

There ya go, Tards. I just gave you your talking point for the day. Scientifically proven that Trump is a lefty.

No need to thank me.
 
I believe there is some truth to the study. If we observe liberal bastions we can see they have a high tolerance for bad shitty odors.


Liberal progressivism stinks, literally, and it’s building sanctuary cities
02.09.2018

By Richard McCarty

In recent years, liberals have been advocating for a way to “help” the homeless deal with the lack of sufficient public toilets. And just what is this brilliant idea? Is it more public restrooms, or more homeless shelters? No, their radical idea is to decriminalize public urination and defecation. Think about that. As the developing world embraces modern hygiene practices and races to stamp out the bad habit of open defecation, urban liberals in the U.S. are pushing to return our cities to the Middle Ages.

In 2015, San Francisco judges stopped issuing bench warrants for the arrest of those who failed to appear in court for quality-of-life crimes, including urinating on the sidewalk. The following year, those judges discarded 66,000 outstanding bench warrants. The judges wanted police officers to suggest treatment programs to offenders rather than write citations for quality-of-life crimes.

In 2016, New York City passed legislation sharply downgrading the penalty for public urination and other antisocial behaviors. According to the champion of this legislation, the purpose was to keep people from getting criminal records. Last year, the Denver City Council unanimously voted to decriminalize public urination and defecation. Their reason: to protect illegal immigrants from deportation.

While no decent person wants to see impoverished or mentally ill people being unnecessarily harassed by the government, let’s not forget that ordinances criminalizing disgusting behavior can have positive effects. For example, jail time — or the threat of it — could cause a runaway to reconnect with estranged relatives; incarceration could help an addict or alcoholic to give up drugs or alcohol; and the threat of an extended jail sentence could push some homeless people to move to a shelter where they might find resources to break out of homelessness.

Public defecation is a severe threat to public health. Recently, California has experienced an outbreak of Hepatitis A, which is spread by fecal contamination. That outbreak has sickened hundreds and killed more than 20. Many of those affected have been homeless or drug users. Public urination may even be a safety hazard: several years ago, a San Francisco light pole fell over on a car after being corroded by urine. Fortunately, the driver of the car was not hit.

Decriminalizing public urination and defecation is a threat to the environment. If human waste remained where it’s deposited, it would be bad enough; but it doesn’t. Unless the waste is cleaned up, it may wind up being dumped into rivers or other bodies of water. This pollution can lead to algae blooms and harm fish, aquatic plants, and other sea life.

Decriminalization of public urination and defecation is also a threat to jobs, the economy, and property values. With brick and mortar stores under siege by online retailers, and with mom and pop businesses battling for survival against much larger competitors, a filthy, smelly street just might force a business to close or move to a cleaner suburb. And with the closing of urban stores, life grows more difficult for those living in poverty nearby. Also, raw sewage can force the closure of beaches and fishing areas endangering yet more jobs. Furthermore, dirty streets and sidewalks can depress real estate values by discouraging potential buyers, thereby trapping owners in upside-down mortgages.

Of course, maybe there wouldn’t be as many homeless people in need of toilets if liberal politicians didn’t fight to keep students in failing schools, didn’t pursue policies that discourage the construction of housing, didn’t create laws and regulations that hinder job creation — and did not pursue sanctuary city policies to attract illegal immigrants.

Anyone who genuinely cares about the less fortunate should seriously reconsider their support for decriminalizing public urination and defecation due to its detrimental impact on public health, the environment, jobs, and property values. Finally, the EPA should investigate to see whether or not these localities that are doing little to discourage such unsanitary behavior comply with the Clean Water Act.

Richard McCarty is the Director of Research at Americans for Limited Government Foundation.
 
I suspect its more about virtually all of the smelly people are leftists and the other 98% of leftists are group "thinked" into lying about how they "think" about body odor and urine.

If they were not group think drones how could the people of San Francisco tolerate its politicians allowing it to be turned into a medieval open sewer type town.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_aqueduct

" By the early Imperial era, the city's aqueducts supported a population of over a million, and an extravagant water supply for public amenities had become a fundamental part of Roman life.[4] The run-off of aqueduct water scoured the sewers of cities and towns. Water from aqueducts was also used to supply villas, ornamental urban and suburban gardens, market gardens, farms, and agricultural estates, the latter being the core of Rome's economy and wealth.[5]"
 
Last edited:
I have found a shortcut to determine if someone it worth any time talking with about futures day trading.

Show them this (set to play at bit with Lady Gaga, best to watch the whole thing) and if they run out of the room, you have a useless conservative brain on your hands. Not 100%, needs other verification but works well with Colombian students at the university.


Seen this video far too many times. My Bladerunner test.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top