Quote from Swan Noir:
Everything does involve risk but I, for one, want to take my counter party risk with guys who are not demonstrably insane. They had a director do a self dealing transaction to invest a significant and material portion of their net capital in a freakin' racetrack. Either their controls were so pathetically perverse that he could do that without an investment committee approving of it or else the directors as a group knew.
Do you want this carload of clowns as your counter party? I do not. Can someone please make the reasoned argument to pick a weak counter party? I have missed things before in life and maybe I am missing something here. Convince me. Use logic and reason to tell me why I should entrust my money (not $50 but thousands) to people who have proven to be unreliable at handling a significant chunk of their own equity.