How can someone be so WRONG so often????
The Senate has held just two prior impeachment trials against presidents — Bill Clinton in 1999 and Andrew Johnson in 1868. Both included witnesses.
Stay in the kiddie pool...
Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry
- Thread starter Big AAPL
- Start date
How can someone be so WRONG so often????
The Senate has held just two prior impeachment trials against presidents — Bill Clinton in 1999 and Andrew Johnson in 1868. Both included witnesses.
Stay in the kiddie pool...
Yeah----no, you have been fully defeated.We will call it a draw for the moment...
The issue is claim of executive privilege and the time of litigation if Trump were to push this to court. Took the court less than two months to decide the issue to let witnesses speak and documents to be turned over. It went to court BECAUSE it was before the Senate trial. Even then it only took less than 2 months.
You should shut the fuck up because at least Tree is replying back with items that are debatable, you keep citing wrong information that a child can google and prove you are wrong.
Impeachment trial has no witnesses... haha....dumbass
That leaves 13 impeachment trials against other federal officials dating back to 1804. Eight of those yielded a guilty verdict, and five a not-guilty finding.
But all of them involved witnesses, said Noah Bookbinder, executive director of the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
But all of them involved witnesses, said Noah Bookbinder, executive director of the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
There certainly is an implied criminal element, quid pro quo bribery and defrauding the American people.
CNN panel cracks up laughing at Trump lawyers trying to make Rudy Giuliani into ‘the coffee boy’
“Rudy Giuliani is a minor player,” Trump lawyer Jane Raskin said. “That shiny object designed to distract you. Senators, I urge you most respectfully: Do not be distracted.”
“Rudy Giuliani is a minor player,” Raskin continued. “That shiny object designed to distract you. Senators, I urge you most respectfully: Do not be distracted.”
CNN host Chris Cuomo questioned the attempt, before playing a clip of Giuliani, who admitted to the crime on his show.
“So you did ask Ukraine to look into Joe Biden?” Cuomo asked.
“Of course I did!” Giuliani exclaimed.
The panel of experts cracked up laughing.
“Rudy Giuliani is a minor player,” Trump lawyer Jane Raskin said. “That shiny object designed to distract you. Senators, I urge you most respectfully: Do not be distracted.”
“Rudy Giuliani is a minor player,” Raskin continued. “That shiny object designed to distract you. Senators, I urge you most respectfully: Do not be distracted.”
CNN host Chris Cuomo questioned the attempt, before playing a clip of Giuliani, who admitted to the crime on his show.
“So you did ask Ukraine to look into Joe Biden?” Cuomo asked.
“Of course I did!” Giuliani exclaimed.
The panel of experts cracked up laughing.
It has to be agreed upon and if not, there will be massive litigation especially in the case of trying to call new witnesses. Furthermore, then litigation concerning executive privilege would ensue as well as litigation about whether or not courts have jurisdiction.
Yeah-----no, there isn't an actual crime being tried in The Senate. There is no implied criminal case whatsoballsout.
Crimes are not tried in the senate, removal is tried in the senate.