Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry
- Thread starter Big AAPL
- Start date
Perfect phone call with the President of the Ukraine.
Also, a perfect conversations when he said he wanted Ambassador You-a-bitch taken out.
Perfect.
It is almost like you have found something, supporting nothing, and making it seem like it is everything.
I beg for your charity on this issue: Please tell me what specific law (Please cite CFR) Trump broke, the evidence proving he broke the law, why allegedly breaking this law is an impeachable offense, and if applicable, evidence that politicians historically either have not technically violated the same type of law or both Parties have not considered such activities as basically a privilege of office. So even if Trump did violate the law, would it just mean the Democrats are attempting to change the status quo on challenging a politician on it and the seriousness of violating a specific law.? Oh, and please try to do better than attempting to shoe horn Trump’s alleged activities into unrelated or inapplicable law.
Please excuse my response in advance of your efforts: Try again. Third time is the charm they say. Good luck.
I am pretty sure that there must be a federal statute somewhere saying that it is a federal crime to win a presidential election without receiving prior approval from the DOJ and the Clintons.
Otherwise, why would the former Director of the FBI and the former Attorney General and their senior leadership make it their highest priority to reverse that?
Last edited:
Charity is injurious unless it helps the recipient become independent of it. You, my friend, have not had an independent thought since you became a groupie for Donald Trump.
Oh well, hopefully someone down my family line eventually evolves to a higher life form, such chimpanzees, or something.
Kind of a weird flex but ok, boomer.
Propaganda 101. Repetition. Say something enough times and many people, especially lower IQ people, will believe.
People have heard the word impeachment so many times that they think that there has to be something to it. The government would not be wasting so much time and money unless Trump did something really bad.
Example - Knowing that - a clandestine operation to bring cocaine into the US and sell it on US streets to fund arming the Contras in El Salvador in direct violation of a decree by Congress and then to lying about it - most would consider this an impeachable offensive and worthy of Congressional Time.
Few would find talking to a foreign leader on the phone to be that out of the ordinary.
Few can deny, like him or not, Trumps is standing tall and taking on all pretenders.
Trump = Extremely Strong
Democrats = Weak (Some have objecting to this association of Democrats with weak. Provide an example when a current Democrat has been strong.)
People have heard the word impeachment so many times that they think that there has to be something to it. The government would not be wasting so much time and money unless Trump did something really bad.
Example - Knowing that - a clandestine operation to bring cocaine into the US and sell it on US streets to fund arming the Contras in El Salvador in direct violation of a decree by Congress and then to lying about it - most would consider this an impeachable offensive and worthy of Congressional Time.
Few would find talking to a foreign leader on the phone to be that out of the ordinary.
Few can deny, like him or not, Trumps is standing tall and taking on all pretenders.
Trump = Extremely Strong
Democrats = Weak (Some have objecting to this association of Democrats with weak. Provide an example when a current Democrat has been strong.)
Either that or sarcasm or mocking. I wasted your assertion there is a meaningful development in the impeachment show and your reply had nothing to do with my points. Those who are not Radical Liberals would call that a weak response. Radical Liberals would call that evidence, I suppose. Besides, whatever I refer to myself as intellectually on this issue seems to still leave you a few rungs lower.
You are welcome to prove me wrong, but based on my experience with other Liberal posters on ET, I am not going to hold my breath. You guys almost never admit when you are wrong, and you are wrong a lot. Often you guys make weak arguments in an attempt to support your pathetic positions.
Care to prove me wrong? Please?
