Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry
- Thread starter Big AAPL
- Start date
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/29/gop-strate[/QUOTE]
Yeh, reminds me of all the pictures that the tards continually posted here of Mueller in uniform in VietNam everytime I or someone else asserted that eventually he would turn out to be a clueless clown.
Maybe Mueller should have worn his uniform to the hearing.
Yeh, reminds me of all the pictures that the tards continually posted here of Mueller in uniform in VietNam everytime I or someone else asserted that eventually he would turn out to be a clueless clown.
Maybe Mueller should have worn his uniform to the hearing.
Yeh, reminds me of all the pictures that the tards continually posted here of Mueller in uniform in VietNam everytime I or someone else asserted that eventually he would turn out to be a clueless clown.
Maybe Mueller should have worn his uniform to the hearing.[/QUOTE]
As you watch right wingers trash a war veteran with a Purple Heart, try not to let your brain overload processing the below image:
That’s Don Jr sitting with two indicted Ukrainian nationals. No service to America, no Purple Hearts just tons of Russian money poured into Republican coffers.
Ingraham called him a double agent..
That’s an interesting allegation but she is too stupid to know she is baselessly accusing the white house of allowing itself to be infiltrated by an enemy in its highest national security levels. That would be such a huge security threat it would make the history books. She’s a total moron.
This Lt. Col. Vindman by his own admission has violated his oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.
He came right out and admitted that he counseled Ukrainian officials on how to frustrate Trump's policies. That's pretty close to treason.
He apparently has no grasp of the concept of civilian control of the military, instead admitting that his concern was that controversial military aid, ie taxpayer funding, for Ukraine would be imperiled by Trump's policy. (Wonder how much of that finds it way to him thorough his Ukraine contacts?) So he set out to frustrate Trump's policy, a clear violation of his duty as a military officer.
He also showed reprehensible disloyalty and insubordination to his Commander in Chief. He was detailed to the White house as a national security aide, not sent there to pursue his own objectives and policy. Whether his motivations were based on loyalty to his homeland, hatred of Trump or financial gain, are irrelevant. He has violated the most basic obligation of a military officer and should be dishonorably discharged and probably prosecuted.
He came right out and admitted that he counseled Ukrainian officials on how to frustrate Trump's policies. That's pretty close to treason.
He apparently has no grasp of the concept of civilian control of the military, instead admitting that his concern was that controversial military aid, ie taxpayer funding, for Ukraine would be imperiled by Trump's policy. (Wonder how much of that finds it way to him thorough his Ukraine contacts?) So he set out to frustrate Trump's policy, a clear violation of his duty as a military officer.
He also showed reprehensible disloyalty and insubordination to his Commander in Chief. He was detailed to the White house as a national security aide, not sent there to pursue his own objectives and policy. Whether his motivations were based on loyalty to his homeland, hatred of Trump or financial gain, are irrelevant. He has violated the most basic obligation of a military officer and should be dishonorably discharged and probably prosecuted.
Those two goons on that table claimed 'executive privilege.'
I see the dem media are presenting Vindman as someone who alerted higher ups to Trump's "national security risk", which was his characterization of aid to Ukraine. That is an absurd claim for military aid that was quite controversial and in fact denied by the Obama administration. It's also a stunning display of Deep State efforts to block Trump's foreign policy.
Enemies, both foreign and domestic...