Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry

Please tell us more about the Russian hoax that you have been lying about since Day 1.
some of us post fake news and we say ‘whoops that might not be real’.
others post fake news for years and continue to believe their own lies.
hoax.jpg


Inbred hick gets his news from Facebook memes and then wonders why everyone else isn't falling for his 'hoax' talking point he got out of Trump's anus.
 
Not a single thing to do with Russian collusion...not a single American charged.
Try again doofus.

Time to update your talking points dumb Con - Roger Stone was found guilty coordinating with wikileaks who released information hacked by Russians.

"Prosecutors accused Stone of telling lawmakers five different lies related to WikiLeaks andAssange, which in 2016 dumped a series of damaging emails about Clinton that US intelligence officials and Mueller later concluded had been stolen by Russian hackers."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ty-verdict-wikileaks-hacking-case-latest-news

There goes that talking point.
 
Time to update your talking points dumb Con - Roger Stone was found guilty coordinating with wikileaks who released information hacked by Russians.

"Prosecutors accused Stone of telling lawmakers five different lies related to WikiLeaks andAssange, which in 2016 dumped a series of damaging emails about Clinton that US intelligence officials and Mueller later concluded had been stolen by Russian hackers."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ty-verdict-wikileaks-hacking-case-latest-news

There goes that talking point.
Stone talked shit but had no real sources...and you remain a useful fucking idiot.
His charges have Nothing to do with the 2016 campaign or Russia -- and everything to do with the frame up/shake down/intimidation racket run by Weissman.

You're wrong. You're falling for spin because you want to believe what you were told by proven liars and manipulators rather than think for yourself.
 
Stone talked shit but had no real sources...and you remain a useful fucking idiot.
His charges have Nothing to do with the 2016 campaign or Russia -- and everything to do with the frame up/shake down/intimidation racket run by Weissman.

You're wrong. You're falling for spin because you want to believe what you were told by proven liars and manipulators rather than think for yourself.

"Stone dispatched in an email to “Get to Assange!” and get the emails."

That's from the link I posted, you didn't even click. What was Stone referring to if not to the 2016 campaign? WTF are you babbling about?

Read the damn verdict, stop wasting my time with your ignorance. It's apparent that neither Breitbart or your shit fake news sources have actually covered any of Stone's crimes.
 
"Stone dispatched in an email to “Get to Assange!” and get the emails."

That's from the link I posted, you didn't even click. What was Stone referring to if not to the 2016 campaign? WTF are you babbling about?

Read the damn verdict, stop wasting my time with your ignorance. It's apparent that neither Breitbart or your shit fake news sources have actually covered any of Stone's crimes.
LOL.
100% process crimes.
NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA COLLUSION And tHE 2016 CAMPAIGN

The charge was that he was the back channel between the campaign and Assange. Disproven during discovery.

They busted him on other shit.
Because he’s a village idiot.
Like you.

Colonel Vindman should be tried and convicted under the same rules...
 
LOL.
100% process crimes.
NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA COLLUSION And tHE 2016 CAMPAIGN

The charge was that he was the back channel between the campaign and Assange. Disproven during discovery.

They busted him on other shit.
Because he’s a village idiot.
Like you.

Colonel Vindman should be tried and convicted under the same rules...

Looks like the dumb Con fake news poster completely missed the trial and the indictment

"According to the indictment, between June and July 2016, Mr. Stone told “senior Trump campaign officials” about the stolen emails in WikiLeaks’ possession that could be damaging to Mrs. Clinton. On July 22 that year, WikiLeaks released its first batch of Democratic emails. After that, according to the indictment, the Trump campaign sought more."


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/25/us/politics/roger-stone-trump-mueller.html

If Stone had no contact, how did he know about impending email leaks from wikileaks?

Pack it up dumb Con, your talking points are history.
 
Looks like the dumb Con fake news poster completely missed the trial and the indictment

"According to the indictment, between June and July 2016, Mr. Stone told “senior Trump campaign officials” about the stolen emails in WikiLeaks’ possession that could be damaging to Mrs. Clinton. On July 22 that year, WikiLeaks released its first batch of Democratic emails. After that, according to the indictment, the Trump campaign sought more."


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/25/us/politics/roger-stone-trump-mueller.html

If Stone had no contact, how did he know about impending email leaks from wikileaks?

Pack it up dumb Con, your talking points are history.
Hook line and sinker...from the fake NY TIMES.
Can’t you think for yourself??

The big rumor for YEARS was that he was the back channel for WikiLeaks to the Trump campaign. This was pushed by everyone In your fake news media.

Then, during the course of discovery they all found out that the "smoking gun" conversation Stone had about WikiLeaks with Trump was after it was public knowledge that Assange had the DNC emails.

POOF goes your bullshit story.
 
Hook line and sinker...from the fake NY TIMES.
Can’t you think for yourself??

The big rumor for YEARS was that he was the back channel for WikiLeaks to the Trump campaign. This was pushed by everyone In your fake news media.

Then, during the course of discovery they all found out that the "smoking gun" conversation Stone had about WikiLeaks with Trump was after it was public knowledge that Assange had the DNC emails.

POOF goes your bullshit story.

Hey dumbass, that was not an editorial by NYTimes, it was a DIRECT quote from the indictment itself

indictment-tear-jumbo.png


How many times are you going to keep failing in this thread?
 
Hey dumbass, that was not an editorial by NYTimes, it was a DIRECT quote from the indictment itself

View attachment 216083

How many times are you going to keep failing in this thread?
Some people find being a Leftard shill more exciting than telling the truth.
You need to take this L, along with all the other L’s, and move on.

Stone's convictions are nothingburgers because he wasn't charged (nor was any other American) with colluding with Russian officials to influence the 2016 election.

Stone was found guilty of being the village idiot. Like you.
 
Back
Top