Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry

piezoe said:
Not to worry. It'll be focused on just straight forward "high crimes" violation of the U.S. Coinstitution, i.e., Bribery! Other stuff my be mentioned in passing , but Bribery is enough to rid ourselves of this disgusting criminal.
More...
Why is he a criminal ? Whatever happened to that whole trump Russian "collusion" nonsense u libtards spewwed 3 years non stop? That amounted to nothing. U were all so convinced tho ?
 
Here's what I wrote:
Frederick Foresight said:
You may want to get yourself checked for bipolar disorder, possibly triggered in part by the dawning realization that Trump is going to do time. On the plus side, they may grant him conjugal visits, so try to think happy thoughts.
More...

Here's how you responded:
Hotcakes said:
I'm in my 40s. Not 80s like most of the guys here. You'll just have to make due with another trump supporter for life bud
More...
You may wish to consider undergoing a cognitive assessment. Just to be on the safe side.
 
Hotcakes said:
Okay butt boy
More...

Ok boober.

914b245a4a8a40183f13ecac256b9586--edward-norton-david-fincher.jpg
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Not all of them do want to stretch it out. Some of them still want to try for a dismissal as soon as it arrives. I am good to go until next spring if they want, and that would be my preference. But I would want either an outright dismissal or a long and drawn out bloodbath. I would not want to give the dems their little pre-planned month of just dirtying the president and the returning to their other business. Nope, there has to be pain. Either the pain of going through all this and just getting a quick dismissal without any theater time, or the pain of blowing up their primary season. I would work against their getting their little one-month sweet spot though.

What the republicans have to work with to drag it out, depends on what the charges sent over to the Senate are. Recent days have created this little assumption that it is going to just be all about the Ukraine just because that is the hype of the month. But I have heard lots of dems spew on about humping in Mueller/obstruction type charges in there too, and I even heard a clown or two talking about trying to work some charges related to paying off Stormy.

The problem with the dems getting too adventurous is that it strengthens trumps defense that lots of people were just out to impeach him for any and all reasons, and that many of them were in the swamp, and that the current whistlespy is part of that bunch. If they go down that road, then trump is fully justified in working all of Horowitz's findings from Horowitz 1 and Horowitz 2 into his defenses, along with the need to do further discovery on them and on additional investigations arising from Durham and daily Solomon and Judicial Watch texts and emails being released. So if the dems do not discipline themselves and stick to just the ukraine issue, then your comment that "most of the leg work has done" will need to be revised by a few months, minimum.
More...

I personally would like to see the two obstruction of justice charges in the perfected charges but that’s not going to happen.

The judiciary committee will ultimately draft the “perfected” charges after the intelligence committee kicks over their findings. Swallwell is really the only showboater on that committee for the Dems and he isn’t stupid enough to blow it.

It could go left but I doubt it.


Wapo is reporting before thanksgiving for Horowitz’s report. But the real question is how the republican senators up in 2020 are looking at the elections from last night. There was a lot of suburban movement and ticket splitting.

Drawing this out will not help Republicans in the senate, neither will a dismissal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top