Pelosi and Dems not informed of al-Baghdadi mission

[Wallet]

Yep but Trump could have stated that, not gone out of his way to brag he did not inform them and flat out say the Speaker of the House was not to be trusted and the head of the House intelligence committee.

So... by the way, who did he inform? you have not given a source.

The individuals notified have not been made public as far as I know, but it is being reported.

And I agree, the trolling by the President isn’t necessary. But today’s political climate is as bad as I have seen, going back to Nixon and Nam. The trolling comes from both sides, so in a way I can empathize with Trump when he counter-punches.

It’s literally a political war being waged for control of the Government and this Nation. And Imo the Democrats will stop at nothing, would rather burn the place down, than let Trump win re-election.

 

[Bugenhagen]

The individuals notified have not been made public as far as I know, but it is being reported.

And I agree, the trolling by the President isn’t necessary. But today’s political climate is as bad as I have seen, going back to Nixon and Nam. The trolling comes from both sides, so in a way I can empathize with Trump when he counter-punches.

It’s literally a political war being waged for control of the Government and this Nation. And Imo the Democrats will stop at nothing, would rather burn the place down, than let Trump win re-election.

"It is being reported" ok well then.. given the way things are we might wait for names.

Trump got into the whole election as a name caller and bully and conspiracy theorist number 1 on an epic scale. He had to thank Infowars after being elected after the dog caught the car.

Your both sides are equally bad angle here does not work. He is corrupting all norms of truth, people get he believes there are no foundation values so lies can become truth if you get enough fooled. But.. at this stage there are plenty who resist.

Had he JUST kept it straight on Saturday and not gone there with he predicted 9/11 etc.. But he offended everyone with a brain.

You know Trump will be followed by someone who carries the baton as David Miscavige took over from L Ron Hubbard.

By then the seeded yes man judges etc. and ex-President Trump never going away will be devastating. Then America is buggered.

He has to go now.

 

[LacesOut]

If it pissed off the Demotard ‘leadership’ - awesome.

 

[UsualName]

Totally rambling post by you. Just a bunch of marbles you rolled out on to the table to pretend to have a response.

No points made whatsoever - and given your lame post I am not asking for any from you- as to why the impeachment process should not properly be before the Judiciary Committee.

And what makes you think the judiciary committee is the proper venue? The only House rule here is that for impeachment it must be an “investigating committee.”

What you’re arguing is not an issue.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

And what makes you think the judiciary committee is the proper venue? The only House rule here is that for impeachment it must be an “investigating committee.”

What you’re arguing is not an issue.

Where did the House review Clnton's and Nixon's?

Let's start there.

 

[UsualName]

Where did the House review Clnton's and Nixon's?

Let's start there.

Why would I follow you on a road going nowhere?

You’re original position is wrong. Petition your House of Representatives member if you would like to see a change to the rules.

 

[vanzandt]

eh, 3 kids died; hardly brilliant. As to the rest, take of it what you will:

U.S. presidents typically follow the protocol of contacting congressional leaders, regardless of their political party, when a high-level military operation is conducted.

“The House must be briefed on this raid, which the Russians but not top congressional leadership were notified of in advance, and on the administration’s overall strategy in the region,” Pelosi said. “Our military and allies deserve strong, smart and strategic leadership from Washington.”

3 kids died? And who killed them? Correct me if I'm wrong... but he could have just as easily surrendered. Besides.... 11 kids were also saved. Trump could have went in and just dropped a bunker-buster and turned the whole place to gravel. Which he did after the operation was over. Those are 11 lucky kids. Maga.

Regarding Pelosi and "typically following protocol"... pffff..... she could bring absolutely nothing to the table, and why take the risk? They were discussing this days in advance, if there was even the slightest chance of word getting out, no way she could be told. It would be a huge unnecessary risk and it would jeopardize the success of the entire mission and worse yet, it could cost American lives. Tell Pelosi lol.... that would be the dumbest tactical move in the history of modern warfare. Protocol "on both sides" was pretty much rendered obsolete starting in November of 2016.

 

[Cuddles]

3 kids died? And who killed them? Correct me if I'm wrong... but he could have just as easily surrendered. Besides.... 11 kids were also saved. Trump could have went in and just dropped a bunker-buster and turned the whole place to gravel. Which he did after the operation was over. Those are 11 lucky kids. Maga.

Regarding Pelosi and "typically following protocol"... pffff..... she could bring absolutely nothing to the table, and why take the risk? They were discussing this days in advance, if there was even the slightest chance of word getting out, no way she could be told. It would be a huge unnecessary risk and it would jeopardize the success of the entire mission and worse yet, it could cost American lives. Tell Pelosi lol.... that would be the dumbest tactical move in the history of modern warfare.
Protocol. Yeah right. Protocol "on both sides" was pretty much rendered obsolete starting in November of 2016.

I'm just saying it was hardly brilliant when you have infact civilian infant casualties and have to resort to option b (option a was to capture him). You're delusional if you think Pelosi would leak operation info. Hell, Trump's own military guys are saying the mission was almost scrapped and likely compromised due to Trump's own "let's pull out" bullshit. So if you're looking for someone to have put our guys in danger (and some were hurt) look at no other than Trump. It wouldn't be his first time either (look at Yemen raid).

 

[vanzandt]

I'm just saying it was hardly brilliant when you have infact civilian infant casualties and have to resort to option b (option a was to capture him). You're delusional if you think Pelosi would leak operation info. Hell, Trump's own military guys are saying the mission was almost scrapped and likely compromised due to Trump's own "let's pull out" bullshit. So if you're looking for someone to have put our guys in danger (and some were hurt) look at no other than Trump. It wouldn't be his first time either (look at Sudan).

How are you going to capture a guy (option a) wearing a suicide vest?
Compromised? They had their guard down since we pulled out. Whack-a-mole H4. Bam!

 

[Cuddles]

How are you going to capture a guy (option a) wearing a suicide vest?
Compromised? They had their guard down since we pulled out. Whack-a-mole H4. Bam!

I have heard the latest "3D chess" spin. It's a good one.

You still resort to option b and take him out solo.