Peak Fish

Quote from GCSICLRBC:

I've studied this topic.

Human beings are a scourge & will be dealt with in due course. A cull of about 60-90% will eventually be in the cards. The bilderberg group will get its way. THINK: Massive viral outbreak so you "gotta" get the government's vaccine. That's the endgame.

It's a shame most people are too ignorant to live & enjoy a vegetarian lifestyle. My last sinful taste of animal flesh was @ Bull & Bear @ Waldorf many years ago & lemme tell you it was an excellent way to go out.

"The measure of a man is what he does with power." ---Pittacus

Peak fish is just plain sad.

Part of the reason I trade futures is I know it's a zero sum game. I take some other guy's money...most likely a selfish, gluttonous scoundrel, who couldn't live a more prosaic life if he tried.

THANKS for posting about peak fish.

I'm sure most trolls here on ET don't think much about matters such as these.

And for those of you who can't wait to reply with a puerile "I love eating steak!," let me save you the trouble: GO F*** yourselves.


--Harold
More...

Perfect example of why enviornmentlist's can be dangerous.

The science of Darwin was a great truth but it was used in a terrible way. People can take things to logical conclusions and wreck havoc. Such as; people have evolved different, therefore some races are more evolved, therefore eliminate the unproductive, the drags on our evolution as a species.

First mentally handicapped; then reduce the breeding of healthy people of a race, which in your opinion, is not as good as your own. As they would slow progression. Then just kill them.

This enviornmental movement can be even more disastrous. There is a free market solution in which no one needs to die my friend. Fish farms. And you do not need to have them in the ocean. They can be on land, you can put them in the Mojave and nothing is impacted. I believe Maryland University has a working fish farm in a factory. So calm down, 60 percent of the people do not need to eliminated.
 
Quote from ByLoSellHi:

Buffalo is far more sustainable than beef...
More...

It absolutely is not. For equivalent production levels of meat, buffalo are at least as environmentally damaging as cows.

There is no "green" food. Every calorie we grow is taking the place of something else.
 
Quote from Dragons Teeth:

Israel has a few and they turn a profit.
More...

There are no profitable companies in Israel, it is an entire country whose very existence depends entirely on subsidies from abroad.

It's like arguing Goldman is profitable because of bailout money it got from AIG.
 
Quote from Illum:

Perfect example of why enviornmentlist's can be dangerous.

The science of Darwin was a great truth but it was used in a terrible way. People can take things to logical conclusions and wreck havoc. Such as; people have evolved different, therefore some races are more evolved, therefore eliminate the unproductive, the drags on our evolution as a species.

First mentally handicapped; then reduce the breeding of healthy people of a race, which in your opinion, is not as good as your own. As they would slow progression. Then just kill them.

This enviornmental movement can be even more disastrous. There is a free market solution in which no one needs to die my friend. Fish farms. And you do not need to have them in the ocean. They can be on land, you can put them in the Mojave and nothing is impacted. I believe Maryland University has a working fish farm in a factory. So calm down, 60 percent of the people do not need to eliminated.
More...

"They" want 60-80% of the population destroyed and it will start happening soon.
 
Quote from Random.Capital:

It absolutely is not. For equivalent production levels of meat, buffalo are at least as environmentally damaging as cows.

There is no "green" food. Every calorie we grow is taking the place of something else.
More...
=====================
I figure you are talking about buffalo ,as in give me a home ;
where the buffalo roam:D Buffalo are also a fish like carp:cool:

And with all due respect , cows do not damage the envirement, they are part of the picture;
that is with proper cows per acre. It varies according to rainfall.................................................................................

Partial disclosure;
I have had some accurate buffalo bullets.

:cool:
 
Quote from Random.Capital:

It absolutely is not. For equivalent production levels of meat, buffalo are at least as environmentally damaging as cows.

There is no "green" food. Every calorie we grow is taking the place of something else.
More...

When Buffalo graze, they do not eat the roots of the grass they are grazing on, like cows do, which leads to barren land, soil erosion, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top