Quote from piezoe:
Could it be that both are right but their
perspectives differ. I think Paulson's statement might have been more accurate had he said "the current economy is very strong in spite of a weak dollar." And the Central Banker might have been more accurate if he had said "the dollar is weak because the supply of dollars is atypically large at the moment. This is being driven primarily by deficit spending in the US. Maintaining the money supply near the current high levels is acomodative toward the US policy of monetarizing their debt." A reasonable person could easily interpret a nation with strong growth in business sectors, but saddled with considerable debt and current deficit spending, as having a rather weak overall economy, because they recognize the dangers that lie ahead. Brazil's economy might be similarly described.