Uh oh.
He is a dead duck.
For sure.


Quote from DAS Trader:
Ron Paul explains this to CNN back in 2008:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sY01Lpg5kqw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
+1Quote from bigarrow:
The smart money is betting Ron Paul is lying about his knowledge of what was written in his newsletter.
He isn't stupid and he is well read and informed on many other issues, it is odd he claims ignorance on this issue.
I don't believe him, not that it matters he would never be president anyway.
Quote from kut2k2:
+1
And the analogy with Obama and Rev. Wright is bogus. I've sat through many a sermon and had no fucking clue what was said immediately after because I just tuned that shit out. But if I was putting out a newsletter with my name on it, you can bet your ass I'd know what was in it at publication time. Ron Paul's mealymouthed excuse-making doesn't pass the laugh test.
It's a fucking newsletter, not the New York Times. WTF was he publishing it for if he didn't have total control over it? Did he lose a bet or something? *rolleyes*
Quote from achilles28:
Ironic CNN taps David Gergen as credible witness. That guy is a regular at Bohemian Grove, which is deeply occultic. Wolf Blitzer knows. He's probably a phag, himself.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/u2wHnuhkUeM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
David Gergen is into some very strange stuff - not even counting the bohemian grove membership - I don't trust anything that guys says.Quote from achilles28:
Ironic CNN taps David Gergen as credible witness. That guy is a regular at Bohemian Grove, which is deeply occultic. Wolf Blitzer knows. He's probably a phag, himself.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/u2wHnuhkUeM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>