Paul Krugman "What Ails The World Right Now Is That Governments Aren’t Deep Enough In Debt"

Um..ok. Sure, buddy.
just about every S&P 500 company has bonds out there. Do you think they issued those bonds knowing full well that they are just borrowing from future shareholders? They hope their debt is intelligent, and will improve future earnings for the shareholders. But they are in the business to make a profit. The government can't even break even. Krugman wants to run the government like a business. What do you think? Should the government be run just like a business?
 
just about every S&P 500 company has bonds out there. Do you think they issued those bonds knowing full well that they are just borrowing from future shareholders? They hope their debt is intelligent, and will improve future earnings for the shareholders. But they are in the business to make a profit. The government can't even break even. Krugman wants to run the government like a business. What do you think? Should the government be run just like a business?

Right. And the fact that many of those "intelligent" companies that issued debt to buyback shares of stock at all-time high prices did it for other than the reason that they were incentivized on share price, right?

Because I'm just a dumb finance guy, but when I remember talking about debt in school, it was issued to do things like modernize infrastructure, buy competition, launch new products, etc.

I must have missed the chapter on issuing debt to buy back stock at highs. Was that the same chapter on "intelligent debt"?
 
Tsing, you probably fell asleep in your WACC class, or stock buy backs financed by debt would at least be familiar to you.

Debt is not inherently good or bad, like most things, it depends on the price. If the US Gov't can borrow for 0%, then they should and spend that money on increasing future production potential (roads, freeways, high speed rail, r&d, education).
 
Right. And the fact that many of those "intelligent" companies that issued debt to buyback shares of stock at all-time high prices did it for other than the reason that they were incentivized on share price, right?

Because I'm just a dumb finance guy, but when I remember talking about debt in school, it was issued to do things like modernize infrastructure, buy competition, launch new products, etc.

I must have missed the chapter on issuing debt to buy back stock at highs. Was that the same chapter on "intelligent debt"?

Occasionally Loyek is coherent, but usually he is talking in circles...
 
chs-8-28-15-4.jpg
 
Tsing, you probably fell asleep in your WACC class, or stock buy backs financed by debt would at least be familiar to you.

Debt is not inherently good or bad, like most things, it depends on the price. If the US Gov't can borrow for 0%, then they should and spend that money on increasing future production potential (roads, freeways, high speed rail, r&d, education).

Maybe you were asleep during the reading of my post? Allow me to highlight the words that were most important as a general service.

"I must have missed the chapter on issuing debt to buy back stock at highs"
 
Maybe you were asleep during the reading of my post? Allow me to highlight the words that were most important as a general service.

"I must have missed the chapter on issuing debt to buy back stock at highs"
it's not high if you think it's going higher. Why not issue a warning to everybody to never trade on margin? same thing
 
Back
Top