Quote from OPTIONAL777:
Not related at all to this thread...
Strawman...
Why do you continue to change the subject away from wacko religious republican leaders?
Quote from 151:
I guess this thread is as good as any other to point out that when you note a fallacy it is not necessary, when no longer doing so for a professor, to classify the fallacy.
In fact all that does is make you look like an ass kissing student.
A simple "that is not a good argument" or "maybe you want to reword your argument" will do.
Evidently 151 thinks everything he learned in school should be left in school because it has no real-world applicability. So glad I didn't go through his "education" process.Quote from Ricter:
Why waste time with "that is not a good argument" when you're going to be asked why it's not? Use the classification. Not to mention maybe, just maybe, the reader will look it up.
Aim for precision and clarity, it's little extra work.

Quote from kut2k2:
Evidently 151 thinks everything he learned in school should be left in school because it has no real-world applicability. So glad I didn't go through his "education" process.![]()
Quote from CaptainObvious:
There is no defense for Robertson. He is clearly insane and full of hate, as is Rev. Wright. Agreed?
Quote from CaptainObvious:
There is no defense for Robertson. He is clearly insane and full of hate