You can make the same wrong argument about Amazon selling only books in 1999.
Amzn had a $40 billion market in 1999. Tsla is currently $400 billion.
You can make the same wrong argument about Amazon selling only books in 1999.
Huh? I only took S2007S's numbers and did the baisc math.You can make the same wrong argument about Amazon selling only books in 1999.
Huh? I only took S2007S's numbers and did the baisc math.
Anyway you do know AMZN still hasn't turn a profit to this day selling books? Prime subscriptions (which no one really gets just to have a book next day) and AWS are the only real profit centers. Extremely profitable but not growing at the rate, or better, that market cap is. Eventually it will all come out in the wash.
Amzn had a $40 billion market in 1999. Tsla is currently $400 billion.
Cool.
Not sure your point though. Let's talk trades
The point was its not a good comparison.
This bubble in TSLA is at least five times the bubble in Tech stocks of the 1999.
The point was its not a good comparison.
This bubble in TSLA is at least five times the bubble in Tech stocks of the 1999.
What qualifies you to make this statement?
Why should anyone pay attention to what you say?
Im just quoting figures.
In March 2000, the P/E for the Nasdaq was 175. And that was huge Bubble.
Tesla, what is it now, 1200
So this TSLA bubble is currently almost 7x bigger than the Tech bubble in March 2001.
Im just quoting figures.
In March 2000, the P/E for the Nasdaq was 175. And that was huge Bubble.
Tesla, what is it now, 1200
So this TSLA bubble is currently almost 7x bigger than the Tech bubble in March 2001.