Quote from Ripley:
It is hard to believe, but the actual market is even easier. Most likely you would turn it into double what you already made.
It works like this, all those Exam Prep companies out there, such as Kaplan etc, they have the hardest practice exams and such. I never got higher than 600 on the Princeton Review GMAT practice exams. But on the real test I rocked the boat and had a 730.
I never made any money paper trading, EVER! The focus for me is just not there when the real money is not on the line. I lost almost 65% of my equity paper trading, but the losses were only half as much with real money.
Quote from Jayford:
Once you know the mechanics, paper trading is a complete waste of time. Almost everyone who paper trades makes money before they go live.
Almost everyone starts losing as soon as they go live.
Systems traders are not immune to this BTW. They simply stop taking their signals, where as discretionary traders do all kinds of stupid things to annihilate accounts. Revenge trading comes to mind as one of these. Something you'd never do with a paper account.
Its been my experience that most of the people who support paper trading ARE paper traders. How would they know?
This profession is 90% psychology, which doesn't kick in with paper trading.
Its best to actually trade, but very small size imo.
Quote from mlbeers:
I did paper trading i started with 10000 and in 5 days turned it into 36000 I know there is know way in the world the actual market is this easy. So how much harder is it?? What is the difference??