Paper Trading Vs The Real Deal

Again, I repost as I have modified some of its contents.
Hopefully I won't need to change again in the near future. ;P

=======================

Your experience will not change Mr. Market. Your experience will only change you. :(

Mr. Market will not change to suit your trading system. You need develop a trading system to suit Mr. Market. :)

Novices adapt their trading systems to their emotions, & no more.
Intermediates adapt their trading systems to their emotions, & adapt their emotions to Mr. Market.
Experts adapt their trading system to Mr. Market, just straight away.

Novices won't learn from their own lessons.
Intermediates will learn from their own lessons.
Experts will learn from others' & their own lessons.

Novices rely on their psychology to win.
Intermediates trains their psychology to win.
Experts ignore their psychology to win.

=======================
 
Quote from JimmyJam:

Just keep posting.

I'm going to start making weekly backups of this thread (starting now).

This stuff is too good to just leave here.

Best,

Jimmy

:)

This is the biggest praise I have ever received. :D

Thank you!
Thank you very much!
My time spent is fully rewarded. :D

PS: But the post doesn't specify whom he is praising, so it may be just wishful thinking on my part. :p
 
I'm glad you become calm again, 2manywhiners!
I usually leave the person alone when it is furious. It's the best to both parties. Only time can cure one's emotions. Only if it's calm will I come back and explain since only calm people will open their ears.
I'm glad to answer your questions from now on since I know you will listen now.
I have never left my state of calm. I'm a practitioner of laughing meditation. I like to incorporate humor into my posts. Sometimes it's a superior path to getting the attention of others.

Just because I said...
I may officially retract some of my previous statements concerning you WmWaster, but only if you clarify how you see yourself fitting into the above quote. Who are you on this list?
...Doesn't mean I'm now flip-flopping and siding with you or anyone else. I honestly wanted to know what you consider yourself to be on your Novice/Intermediate/Expert statement. Which was it? I didn't hear a specific answer. I gave one though...
I myself would have to claim Intermediate for the channeling of my psychological emotions. As well as both Intermediate and Expert as pertaining to the education from mine and others' lessons.
Now I suppose I'm even more curious, where do you see yourself? I'm pretty sure I already know the answer though...
Now ignore what I say about psychology first. Do you agree the above criteria are important as a successful winner and simulated trading can help you achieve all of them (except psychology)?

If so, there's no reason why you need skip the step of simulated trading, no matter your status about psychology.
And to reply to your question, No I don't agree with your statement. I will, however, do what few people on ET actually do, I will support why I do, and why I don't agree with it. Green = yes I agree, Red = No I do not agree. Let's play.
First what's the use of a complete simulated trading. It's to:
- help testing your trading methods/rules/systems
- help testing your money management & position sizing
- be familiar with your trading software and execution procedures (it's more important if you intraday)
- be familiar with your decision making procedures & reaction (it's more important if you intraday)
- simulate your psychology (the hidden values!!)
Now I want to support why I disagreed. Numero Uno: Position Sizing. In theory, Simulators will help beginners to learn and/or calculate appropriate position sizing. In reality, Live trading will not always allow you to buy or sell the appropriate number of shares you intended to buy or sell. This is called a partial order. See also: d) and e) on page 14's a) through p) list. Numero Due: Execution Procedures. In theory, Simulators allow beginners to learn how the execution of orders takes place. In reality, order execution does not reflect Simulation. Some orders are filled almost instantly, and with the full number of shares as was requested. Some orders take many seconds or several minutes to fill. Some orders fill only a part of the intended number of shares. Some orders fill after several minutes, and then only are partially filled. Many orders are never filled at all. I'm not just talking about limit orders either, any of the above examples can, and do, occur with market orders as well. See also: a), b), c), d), e), and m) on page 14's a) through p) list. Numero Tre: (Decision) Reaction. In theory, Simulators allow beginners to learn how to take the appropriate action and react to a specific movement in the market. In reality, this is not always possible. When you have decided to react to a move in the market, whether it be a decision to buy or sell, you will not always be able to obtain the entire position size, or exit from the position as soon as you wanted. When volatility increases, supply and demand becomes skewed. This is why there are so many rapid fluctuations in price over such a short period of time. The reason traders are able to obtain the biggest price movements in such short periods of time is directly related to volatility. Supply becomes restricted, demand signifigantly increases, and the result is a large move upward in the price of the stock. 1000 people want to buy it, 250 want to sell it, and somewhere in between, 750 people get left out. This is a major reason why large price fluctuations trade on very little volume, and are accompanied by slow price movement periods that trade on such high levels of volume. Just because you wanted to react to an occurance in the market, doesn't mean you will be able to. See also: b), d), e), n), and p) on page 14's a) through p) list. Numero Quattro: Psychology. In theory, the mindset of trading with dollars that aren't real can be ignored, and replaced with the mindset that every fake dollar is as important as every real dollar. In reality, a very, very select few people may be able to do just that, but many, many people will not. period. I've already given my take on the psychology of trading with fake dollars versus real dollars. Besides, you asked me to ignore the psychology aspect so I will.
So the next question is whether a successful simulated trading guarantee a successful live trading. That's the distinction between intermediates and experts. An intermediate has to go through live trading, learn from their mistakes, and grow up. It's nothing wrong but you need to spend more bucks before you win. An expert can avoid these unnecessary costs.
My answer? No. Successful Sim trading can help a new trader, this is true. BUTT, most new traders, regardless of whether they trade Sim or Live, are simply not prepared. Plain and simple. They often know what is happening, but rarely know why. That, along with the inability to adapt to change, is why the vast majority of traders fail. Now, as far as your association with traders who start Live being intermediates, and traders who start on a paper trading repitoir similar to yours being Experts...

That's just plain false. It's Wrong. It's Not true. And its down right criminal to imply so. I'm not saying that skipping Sim trading will make any new trader anything but a novice. Regardless of how the vast majority of traders start trading, Live or Sim, they're almost always wrong. Those who start out UNPREPARED will lose. They don't get it. They are stuck on their ignorance, and they refuse to adapt. AGAIN, I'm not saying either way is right, I'm saying most people are just doing it wrong. Sim trading has its downfalls [See page 14's a) through p) list.] Most Sim traders overlook these when starting out Live. The ones who decide to learn why they're losing, or not trading as well as they were (since you insist there is at least one trader who started out profitable), will figure out what the differences are. Those who do will usually "Get it." Those who don't just keep trading, with a dumbfounded look on thier face, until their account runs out, or until they give up and start paper trading again. The latter example will not fix the problem. I think...
JimmyJam said it best:

If you've traded live you know Paper Trading can help you develop a system which has positive expectancy, but when you execute it you probably will experience emotions which hadn't factored into The Plan. If The Plan is good it will carry you through any potential drawdown into profitability, or you will realize your error(s) and go back to the drawing board.

If you've Traded Live you know that there is nothing like it in terms of what you experience and (hopefully) learn from your trading. If you've got a winner, you know it (and somewhere along the way you will realize why they traders who fail, do).

Ultimately, it's your money so you have to decide what, where, when and how you choose to trade.
As far as the rest of your post... smoking is a bad analogy. Many smokers smoke until they die of cancer. Same thing here with most unprepared traders, wait maybe that actually was a good analogy...
Last but not least, I think this question is most concerned by you. "Did you gain just after your sim trading?" I'm reluctant to answer because I know you cannot gain by a straightforward answer. I wish you can understand and judge based on the descriptions, reasons & explanations I offer, not just a simple answer. You can't learn from it. You might even fail since you have no faith/understanding on it. It's like you'll probably screw things up if I just give you the secrets of trading straight away. If you see & understand my way of sim trading will lead you to success, you will follow religiously and follow successfully.

But I think you wish to know now because you can't judge based on my explanations, or you need some confirmations. Then I can tell you: "Yes, it's what I did, and how I succeeded for the very first time I trade with my first trading methods! New traders, you could do the same as long as you know how to sim trading in my way!"
Forget humor, this is down right comical. Ha.
 
partial fill from page 14's a) through p) list:

Many of you Paper Street Soap Company advocates haven't yet figured out why so many brokers offer FREE simulators. It's because they want you to try their product. The programs always give you fills instantly, and at the best price (a lot of the time it's an even better price). When you want out, guess what? Instant fill. Never a partial. Never. These programs aren't designed to help new traders. They're designed to SELL PRODUCTS meaning, they want their platform to appear perfect, even though the market is not.

Psychology isn't the only problem new traders face when going Live. It's just as much platform function, or better put, dysfunction. When new traders first go live, they find out that: a) fills aren't instant. b) limit buy orders are rarely filled when and how you want them filled. [That is, if they even fill at all] c) market buy orders are never filled at the bid. d) partial orders suck, and they happen frequently. [with mid-to-large orders, or volatility] e) when you want out of a falling stock, people aren't always there to buy the first instant you want out. f) simulators don't charge margin fees. g) simulators don't have margin calls. h) simulators don't charge exchange fees. i) simulators don't charge broker fees. j) FREE simulators don't charge platform fees. k) simulators don't have mysterious charges on the bill. l) on occasion, data feeds go whack for no apparent reason at all. m) simulators don't require calls to the broker because the platform crashed ["Sir, it didn't crash, it's just down right now." Try making that call a polite and courteous one when you can't enter a sell order and your position is still open on a stock that just broke news you haven't read yet because you're STILL on the GD PHONE!] n) simulators rarely require the usage of antacids. o) simulators aren't begging you to wait just a little bit longer... and lastly, p) SIMULATORS DON'T MAKE YOU VOMIT!!!

Paper Traders learn these same things when they go Live. However, they've spent days, weeks, months, or years formulating a trading plan based on a market that doesn't exist (at least not as they know it) and they almost always seem more reluctant to embrace the market's inefficiencies. Even then the ones that eventually "get it" have to unlearn even the basic functions of the market, before they can move forward.
 
Quote from 2manywhiners:

And to reply to your question, No I don't agree with your statement. I will, however, do what few people on ET actually do, I will support why I do, and why I don't agree with it. Green = yes I agree, Red = No I do not agree. Let's play.
Now I want to support why I disagreed. Numero Uno: Position Sizing. In theory, Simulators will help beginners to learn and/or calculate appropriate position sizing. In reality, Live trading will not always allow you to buy or sell the appropriate number of shares you intended to buy or sell. This is called a partial order. See also: d) and e) on page 14's a) through p) list. Numero Due: Execution Procedures. In theory, Simulators allow beginners to learn how the execution of orders takes place. In reality, order execution does not reflect Simulation. Some orders are filled almost instantly, and with the full number of shares as was requested. Some orders take many seconds or several minutes to fill. Some orders fill only a part of the intended number of shares. Some orders fill after several minutes, and then only are partially filled. Many orders are never filled at all. I'm not just talking about limit orders either, any of the above examples can, and do, occur with market orders as well. See also: a), b), c), d), e), and m) on page 14's a) through p) list. Numero Tre: (Decision) Reaction. In theory, Simulators allow beginners to learn how to take the appropriate action and react to a specific movement in the market. In reality, this is not always possible. When you have decided to react to a move in the market, whether it be a decision to buy or sell, you will not always be able to obtain the entire position size, or exit from the position as soon as you wanted. When volatility increases, supply and demand becomes skewed. This is why there are so many rapid fluctuations in price over such a short period of time. The reason traders are able to obtain the biggest price movements in such short periods of time is directly related to volatility. Supply becomes restricted, demand signifigantly increases, and the result is a large move upward in the price of the stock. 1000 people want to buy it, 250 want to sell it, and somewhere in between, 750 people get left out. This is a major reason why large price fluctuations trade on very little volume, and are accompanied by slow price movement periods that trade on such high levels of volume. Just because you wanted to react to an occurance in the market, doesn't mean you will be able to. See also: b), d), e), n), and p) on page 14's a) through p) list.

Agghh...
As said previously, I will take a pessimistic approach when I handle order fill. So I won't overestimate my situation.

Hmm... but I don't understand why most, if not all, you mention cannot be experienced in sim trading (I mean demo trade in real-time, & the software will check for your order fill!). Eg: your virutal order may not get filled when the price suddenly spikes.

Anyway, even if you trade real, there's really nothing we could learn to improve our order fill. The problem lies on the market, not us. If the market has 25 orders at this price, you can only fill 25 orders but no more. Maybe just learn not to be greedy and reduce your size to 25 market orders only whe you see such situations.

Market selection is much more important in this regard. If you get stuck at that point, a high volume and very liquid market is the cure to your position sizing & order fill problems.

The only "real" problem I could think of is you never know how influential your orders are in the market, but unless you have lots of capitals or you trade thin markets, it's hardly a concern you should be waste time on. You're not going to trade by your own influence, right?

------------

As to psychology, I think I have already explained about my reasons/points in depth.

To me, I get most, if not all, I want just from sim trading. Thus it's hard for me to persuade myself sim trading won't work as far as psychology is concerned. You may call me freak, but that's me. :cool: You see the point?

However it's no surpirse most people can't understand or disagree (that's why it's still called hidden value, & so there're more losers than winners!). If you are one of them, it's nothing wrong to follow the intermediate approach. As you are someone who needs some first-person pains before grow-up, then trade live, but trade small. ;)

Anyway let's agree to disagree. Be well! :P
 
WmWaster,

Do you consider yourself a guru or what? You obviously consider yourself to be an expert. Yet you can't, or at least choose not to, elaborate on how Sim traders should go about overcoming the inefficiencies of the market in their paper trading plans. You know what I'm talking about (hint, hint... page 14) And you aren't exactly answering my questions, as I have yours, you just keep playing hopscotch around them. You state an opinion that you and your methods of paper trading are so superior, but you refuse to CLEARLY explain why. I have come to the conclusion that you do not speak english as a first language, but despite your inability to form coherent sentences, you sure say a lot with out saying much of anything useful.

I have an idea. How about we both agree to let some others chime in with their take. Let's keep the board clear of what is obviously turning into an argument, and let's just listen to what others have to say. I was starting to really relate to some of the things JimmyJam had to say, among several others, but it seems we are overcrowding this thread. How about we sit back and hear some responses from others for a few days?

So, Others, let us know what your take is. Throw something else out here for everyone to chew on.

Thanks.
 
Back
Top