No, I have no limit of stocks but I was thinking that at least 100 or 200 if that's is statistically significant and it could be more or less depending if I'm able to grab something really important from it or not at some point or not.
Regarding the position size, yes, it's an unknown variable here that I could resolve exactly by doing what I'm doing. If by luck I find some common traits in what works best and what works less, that could help me to set a weight on my real trades, if not, then the weight would remain equal meaning that all trades start with a 50% change of win or loss.
But there is not only that, I want also train my eyes to what I'm doing, so one day I can remove any fear or greed from it and make it normal business without caring about the outcome, I'm not there yet. And other details like finding out if some entries are valid or not for example if they are under ema 200 or above ema 100/50.
I know that part of this if not all could be back-tested and I already did the back-test job, now I want to get used to it in real time, when 1 day lasts 1 day and not 1 computer tick. It's also necessary to get the feeling (if I ever get it) in real time when a trade could not work and eventually get out of it, you cannot back-test that.
At the same time this also helps me to optimize and stabilize my routine of screening and classifying the stocks to trade, not so long ago I had something like 6-8 watch lists from different sources that had duplicates and in which I was sometimes lost, now I have put good order in it and have only 2 active lists for trading and some others as archives.
My goal at the end is to reach that level, where you know, less is more, I mean, when I have removed all the noise, when I'm sure that my pool of stocks to trade is strong and that I don't need to watch elsewhere fearing that I'm missing out something, and finally that my system works at least 50% of the time.
This are the main reasons for this.