Quote from jem:
so the 3 am call came and obama did not answer.
Imagine... this answer is better than what really happened.
Bill Clinton had two unique things going for him. One was the Internet boom that propelled his 2nd term. The other was a Republican Congress and a decision by Bill to work with them.Quote from 377OHMS:
Hillary Clinton called it.
I wonder what condition the country would be in now if Hillary Clinton had been elected President instead of Barrack Obama.
During the Bill Clinton era many of my friends and family prospered in business and I was pretty satisfied with how the country was being run. I lost some respect for Bill Clinton when he was caught philandering with interns but that did not change my perception that the country and foreign policy was being run fairly competently.
I didn't agree with everything though. I thought Clinton made a huge mistake when he agreed to supply cash, fuel and food aid to North Korea in exchange for them curtailing their nuclear activity. I wasn't real happy with how the Bosnian/Serb conflict was managed. Yet I thought he did a good job and I was very satisfied with his performance on the deficit and budgets. I wonder if Hillary would have put in a similar performance.
Quote from pspr:
Bill Clinton had two unique things going for him. One was the Internet boom that propelled his 2nd term. The other was a Republican Congress and a decision by Bill to work with them.
The situation with the country is sooooo different today that I doubt either Bill or Hillary could do what Bill did in the late 90's. However, I don't think Hill would have pursued all the stupid ideological and vengeful tack that Obama is trademarked for the last four years and the next four.
Obama is uniquely unqualified to be President.
Quote from denner:
You're right. The mid-late 90's were the epicenter of the credit bubble as it morphed into a soaring and unsustainable stock market that fueled a great deal of the expansion in jobs (and unfortunately the growth of government at all levels). Even though I despised Clinton by the end of his term, he's by far the best of the recent bunch (both as an intellectual and as a politician).
Regardless of who is occupying the WH, the vast majority of their "legacy" is entirely dependant upon the machinations of the Fed and how loose or tight they are with monetary policy. I'm sure it's not a popular opinion, but the facts speak for themselves over the past century.
Quote from denner:
The mid-late 90's were the epicenter of the credit bubble as it morphed into a soaring and unsustainable stock market that fueled a great deal of the expansion in jobs (and unfortunately the growth of government at all levels). Even though I despised Clinton by the end of his term, he's by far the best of the recent bunch (both as an intellectual and as a politician).
Regardless of who is occupying the WH, the vast majority of their "legacy" is entirely dependant upon the machinations of the Fed and how loose or tight they are with monetary policy. I'm sure it's not a popular opinion, but the facts speak for themselves over the past century.
.Quote from Spike Trader:
See . . . if you stay sober, and apply your mind, you can make some clear and rational assessments..
Quote from jem:
If the press does not hang this administration for this, the press should just turn in their journalism degrees and passes.