Quote from IShopAtPublix:
Why is that republicans have this emotional protest against double taxation. If I gave you a billion dollars as a gift you would pay a tax on it, if you gave what was left after taxes (or large portion of it) to someon else, the recipient would pay a tax as well and so on and so on. The point being the tax would be paid as MANY TIMES AS NECESSARY. I treat the estate tax as a tax on a gift to one's progeny.
As I said many times, the discussion needs to start with spending not taxes. US government spends insane amounts of money. Taxes and spending should decrease or increase together. I am fine with dividend tax because it is income to the recipient.
In a previous post you mentioned Bill Clinton, Bushes as harvard elites and no difference.
Nobody in their right mind would compare a self made Rhodes Scholar, Yale Law Graduate to a silver spoon miserable failure known as george w. bush. W could not find oil in Texas. He has driven several companies into the ground. W would be a homeless junkie if not for his father. It is not Harvard elites that are a problem it is people's criteria that are problem.
People thought having someone you can have a beer with was an important criteria in 2000. Big mistake. Palin's folksy crap could carry the day today. Competence and personal achievement have to be primary considerations. That thought needs to be hammered into people's heads until they understand it.
P.S After reading your posts for some time I think I know a few sites you may be interested in (or you may be visiting them on a regular basis already)
www.stormfront.org
www.whitecivilrights.com
www.davidduke.com
To hell with rednecks!
"Competence and personal achievement have to be primary considerations."
are you suggesting that these are the primary considerations when choosing a leader?
your post disproves your point ...