Pairs Trading Strategy Model

Currently on INTC/ALTR (higher correlation + high fundamental skew- earnings expectations and profit margins). Considering TXN/XLNX (analogs). On GLG/MDG as of close. Earnings can be the best time to enter these spreads- IF volaitlity breaks your way. My biggest wins have been during earnings.
 
Quote from Avaturk:

Currently on INTC/ALTR (higher correlation + high fundamental skew- earnings expectations and profit margins). Considering TXN/XLNX (analogs). On GLG/MDG as of close. Earnings can be the best time to enter these spreads- IF volatility breaks your way. My biggest wins have been during earnings.

Hi Avaturk,

INTC/ALTR looks good. INTC/XLNX was recommended by Pairstrading.com a couple of days ago. Kind of same thing. Earnings on Intel would be beneficial if they were bad. XLNX and Altera have a higher Beta so they would fall harder than INTC. If earnings are good you will see the same yield on both stocks IMHO. GLG/MDG looks strong. Although RSI14 is 86.89, I would wait for 10DMA cross from above. What is your stop loss/profit objective on that?

Al
 
wow after all these posts I am still confused. You buy 2 stocks in the same industry:confused:
All that school and all those seminars for nothing.
On a serious note all I can say is that you have to possess pain tolerance to pain trade-opps I mean pear trade.

inmate451

which I don't have:mad:
 
I haven`t been here for a while. So, how long you`ve been doing this and what is your experience now ?
We recently also test kinda mixed pairs/spreads strategies. What do you think ?
 
haven't been here recently too. our strategy started early december live trading and is up 3.65% by yesterday evening. is much better than tests indicated but it seems that this year end was good for all mean reversion strategies.

we are moving towards fundamental analysis.
I am thinking of something like pairing a small cap and a big cap on fundamental and technical data. the idea is that small caps should offer more upside. thus I actually try to capture the different risk profile between the two. I have not hear about that in pairs trading so far - anybody ever tried such thing.

at the same time we are starting with intraday testing. we prepared our test software and should be able to start tests today or tomorrow. in pairs trading context i am most curious about very similar pairs like fnm-fre. i think there must be a way to profit from this obvious pair if you are not too big and well equipped.


peace
 
Quote from ChrisM:

I haven`t been here for a while. So, how long you`ve been doing this and what is your experience now ?
We recently also test kinda mixed pairs/spreads strategies. What do you think ?

Hi ChrisM,

I have been trading for over 12 years now. I am doing pairs trading exclusively since September 2002. I use my own technical system based on price correlation analysis. I looked at the yield model as well. The price model is easier to compute and it gives you better stats ( at least in my case).
Believe it or not, mixed pairs produced better stats and actual results. Last 4mo record: 86 trades/ 72 gains/ 14losses. cumulative gain 8.86%. Average per month +3.48%.
Same sector pairs: 32 trades/ 18 gains/ 16 losses. cumulative gain 2.01%. Average per mo +0.64%. The problem is that the pairs approach the stop loss before they revert. So the assumption that the same sector pairs perform better is wrong, I guess.
What are your strategies? Are they purely technical or fundamentals-based?

Al
 
Quote from Neutral_Al:

Last 4mo record: 86 trades/ 72 gains/ 14losses. cumulative gain 8.86%. Average per month +3.48%.
Same sector pairs: 32 trades/ 18 gains/ 16 losses. cumulative gain 2.01%. Average per mo +0.64%.

Neutral Al, are you counting a 'trade' as a pair or trades independently? The reason I ask is that with a pair, one would expect about a 50% win/loss ratio, hoping that in the end, your winners make more $ than your losers, with occasionally both trades making money (long going up, short going down) or both trades losing money (long going down, short going up). Out of 86 trades, 72 of them produced gains ~ 83% wins. Can you explain or go into more detail? Thanks,
PT
 
Quote from PearTrader:

Quote from Neutral_Al:

with a pair, one would expect about a 50% win/loss ratio, hoping that in the end, your winners make more $ than your losers, with occasionally both trades making money (long going up, short going down) or both trades losing money (long going down, short going up). Out of 86 trades, 72 of them produced gains ~ 83% wins. Can you explain or go into more detail? Thanks,
PT

PearTrader,

I consider a pair of stocks a primary trading vehicle. I do not look at the stocks separately. When you look at a pair of stocks as a unit your statistics change as well as your thinking about the whole process. For example, your short does not have to go down to make money. It just has to gain less than your long.
You do not expect 50% win/loss ratio because you look for statistically high probability events. 83% wins is about right - that is what I got testing S&P 500. I think I talked about it in my earlier posts.

Al
 
Neutral Al,

I also switched to pairs trading about a year ago. Overall positive results. However, I've generally not had stop loss points. I've either added to my position or waited it out.

For your trades in which you have gotten stopped out, have you ever gone back to see how the pair performed longer term? I've had a few loosers that ultimately would have been winners had I hung on and plenty of times I've recovered from a loss and sold at breakeven only to see shortly afterwards that I should have hung on.
 
Quote from Hurricane:

For your trades in which you have gotten stopped out, have you ever gone back to see how the pair performed longer term? I've had a few loosers that ultimately would have been winners had I hung on and plenty of times I've recovered from a loss and sold at breakeven only to see shortly afterwards that I should have hung on.

Careful with those. I know some people who are STILL hanging on to the FNM/FRE pair someone mentioned. "It's gotta come back..." More traders turned investors.

:cool:
 
Back
Top