Quote from snappy:
Rufus, could you elaborate on how you think these systems are working, because it seems now that most markets have these automated systems now.
Do you think the systems are mostly in house systems from goldmans etc, or are you seeing big locals using them.
thanks
snap
Well, I run a few automated systems, so the systems are working I suppose. It is hard for a single big local to come up with a complex automated system, since these systems require quants, developers, etc, all are fairly expensive resources, unlike the clerks that could be had in the old days for much cheaper.
While ibanks have fairly sophisticated automated systems, other trading entities like large hedge funds, sophisticated trading firms (like DRW, Wolverine, Getco, Peak6, etc) are also match the ibanks in the automated trading game. From my perspective, it cost a fairly high amount of fixed cost to get into the game, such as infrastructure (data center, direct exchange feeds, etc), system development, strategy analysis, etc. Hence the world of high frequency automated system is not that big, substantially smaller than the "big locals". However, once such platform is in place, it gets easier to trade more products, for instance, it is not uncommon for an automated market maker in option markets that MM for 50-100 names, impossible in the open outcry environment.