_pabst question/ response
_________________________________________________
Jem, there is no denying that without an edge in trading, or innate athletic ability in sport, one cannot succeed. But what about those who have ability and don't make the grade. Is it not more about psychology and less about the drill. What about a John Daly? Under achieving talented headcase is a lexicon of the times. Why do top hitters go after so many bad pitches. Why do guys in sports and trading (all the same game) rotate from slump to streak to slump. You can't tell me it's random. My equity may look random but I know in my heart of hearts that virtually every mistake I make is less one of technique and more of mental. I only wish I could blame the markets, or the difficulty of the course, or that pitchers unhittable stuff, but when you've got the goods and you don't make it work you'd better look within.
____________________________________________________
Tough question and I could let it slide even though I felt I should leave Publias' thread to Publias. So I thought your question deserved its own thread as I do not have the complete answer.
I do know this. In a sport I attempted to play as a professional I was told by coaches (who had coached top pros and were not charging me) that I had the talent. However, I never really performed up to expectations. But I loved the competition.
Then after a stint as a lawyer I started trading. I lost money the first few months then spent about a year of breakeven trading. I questioned myself about whether I had the goods for competition. Did I have the mental makeup. I had already studied all great deal of zen stuff as a young athlete and it did not matter then and did not matter as a break even trader.
Then I went and trained for a week with guys who were making money and started making money from day two. Rarely having a losing week for the next 4 years. Last year I had losing months becasue that style was not working until about 5 weeks ago.
Now during this time, my confidence went up and down with my success and getting married and other concerns certainly had impacts on my performance. But for me it is all about having the right tools for the right job and then executing with the proper risk reward parameters. I have watched people of every mental capcacity and makeup make a living in trading offices (of course some money losers as well) over the past five years and consequently, I feel it is succes is about small successes breeding larger successes.
All this is obviously, one sided and not dualistic as publias would say but I choose to emphasize the tools for the job side and I welcome competing thoughts. I am in a rush as I went home allow the ant killers in my house and now they are here so I must end this post in the middle of other peoples trading day. (Mine ended at 8:30 pac time.)
_________________________________________________
Jem, there is no denying that without an edge in trading, or innate athletic ability in sport, one cannot succeed. But what about those who have ability and don't make the grade. Is it not more about psychology and less about the drill. What about a John Daly? Under achieving talented headcase is a lexicon of the times. Why do top hitters go after so many bad pitches. Why do guys in sports and trading (all the same game) rotate from slump to streak to slump. You can't tell me it's random. My equity may look random but I know in my heart of hearts that virtually every mistake I make is less one of technique and more of mental. I only wish I could blame the markets, or the difficulty of the course, or that pitchers unhittable stuff, but when you've got the goods and you don't make it work you'd better look within.
____________________________________________________
Tough question and I could let it slide even though I felt I should leave Publias' thread to Publias. So I thought your question deserved its own thread as I do not have the complete answer.
I do know this. In a sport I attempted to play as a professional I was told by coaches (who had coached top pros and were not charging me) that I had the talent. However, I never really performed up to expectations. But I loved the competition.
Then after a stint as a lawyer I started trading. I lost money the first few months then spent about a year of breakeven trading. I questioned myself about whether I had the goods for competition. Did I have the mental makeup. I had already studied all great deal of zen stuff as a young athlete and it did not matter then and did not matter as a break even trader.
Then I went and trained for a week with guys who were making money and started making money from day two. Rarely having a losing week for the next 4 years. Last year I had losing months becasue that style was not working until about 5 weeks ago.
Now during this time, my confidence went up and down with my success and getting married and other concerns certainly had impacts on my performance. But for me it is all about having the right tools for the right job and then executing with the proper risk reward parameters. I have watched people of every mental capcacity and makeup make a living in trading offices (of course some money losers as well) over the past five years and consequently, I feel it is succes is about small successes breeding larger successes.
All this is obviously, one sided and not dualistic as publias would say but I choose to emphasize the tools for the job side and I welcome competing thoughts. I am in a rush as I went home allow the ant killers in my house and now they are here so I must end this post in the middle of other peoples trading day. (Mine ended at 8:30 pac time.)