CDOs
They may have a very similar structure, but I'm not sure it's accurate to say that one is a subset of the other. Everything I am reading indicates that there are substantive differences between the two, and that the risks are simply not the same.
The CDOs that collapsed in 2008 were backed exclusively by subprime residential mortgages.
CLOs are something else.
Here's an interesting article published by Schwab a few years ago:
https://www.schwabassetmanagement.c...hy-they-arent-likely-to-topple-banking-system
I know because I was in it, what a trip.
CLOs default rate is the same as any other default rate.
New corporate loan issues almost every month if you are in this space.
The articles I have cited both say that CLOs do not have the same default rate, or the same risk profile, as CDOs. That doesn't mean they are correct. I have not tried to fact-check these claims. But the default rate is an objective fact, not a matter of opinion.
I would not try to buy a CLO directly. I don't have that kind of capital.
I sometimes buy individual corporate bonds. But that's not the same as investing in something like Oxford Lane Capital.
Ooh… I thought of a Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) as a generic umbrella term for any collateralized obligation; i.e. “CxO.” This would include securities such as a Collateralized Mortgage Obligation (CMO), Collateralized Loan Obligation (CLO), Collateralized Crypto Obligation (CCO), etc.No, not CDOs
CLOs.
Apparently, there are some important differences.
I just ran across this blog post, published a few days ago, by the Van Eck fund group:
https://www.vaneck.com/us/en/blogs/income-investing/clos-vs-cdos-understanding-the-difference/
