As a lawyer, in my opinion, Overstock's lawsuit is a complete loser. Overstock doesn't even say in the lawsuit that the statements made by the Defendants were false. The only thing they hang their hat on is the non-disclosure of alleged collaboration between Gradient and Rocker. More importantly, the California business practices statute they cite is patently inapplicable to the actions of Gradient and Rocker.
See Section 17500 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=bpc&codebody=17500&hits=20
This reminds me of the desperate attempt Aremissoft made to stop the shorts when it sued Rocker, Thestreet.com and others back in 2001. The company later filed for bankruptcy in 2002, and some officers were subsequently indicted.
http://www.crm-daily.com/story.xhtml?story_id=11774
See Section 17500 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=bpc&codebody=17500&hits=20
This reminds me of the desperate attempt Aremissoft made to stop the shorts when it sued Rocker, Thestreet.com and others back in 2001. The company later filed for bankruptcy in 2002, and some officers were subsequently indicted.
http://www.crm-daily.com/story.xhtml?story_id=11774