Quote from Cre8UrF8:
Your inventing some fuzzy math there bub, you can't get 15:1 just because you have 50/50 long to short.
Don even admits that Bright (Bob) only has $10million of firm capital in it. That really isn't more than others like Echo and Generic. The way Bright gives out so much overnight leverage is through the use of options against large concentrated positions the firm holds. The options limit the risk on the large position the firm has in that particular stock and therefore lowers the amount of capital they need to actually have to carry that position. It is all done with smoke and mirrors and inventive financing. Not that there is anny thing wrong with it or anything for traders to worry about. But Don doesn't tell people that's how they do it and tries to play it off as Bright having huge amounts of capital, which isn't true. Bright isn't anymore well capitalized than other firms, however they do alow much more buying power to traders. Which I feel is a huge risk.
A month ago a Bright trader put on positions that were 700:1 of his deposit before their risk manager caught it. Any firm that doesn't have parameters to prevent this and only reacts after the fact is dangerous in my opinion. Just the facts.
My post was a simplified analysis of the leverage...
** ANY B/D ** can legally employ (if they can get it financed)...
** In the context of the NASD Net Capital Rule **.
Your post was nothing more than Hot Air... devoid of relevant factual material.
You people keep trying to isolate individual positions at Bright.
The only thing that matters is that the entire Bright holdings be close to 50/50 long/short...
Which qualifies for an NASD haircut of about 7.5% = 13.33 leverage.
(Naked = 15%... hedged = 7.5%)
THAT IS COMMON STOCK.
For example, a closed end muni bond fund on the NYSE would be HALF of that.
If you are Long $10 million and Short $10 million in Muni Bond Funds...
The Net Capital Rule would require a MAX 7% haircut on ONE side...
So the B/D needs to put up only 3.5% in capital = 700K...
IF he can get the rest financed by Clearing Firm or Bank.
(This is actually a very low risk position if managed by a pro).
The point is...
Bright can pretty much give out all the leverage that they want...
IF they can view the entire Firm as one Portfolio for their FOCUS filing...
And if they can satisfy the "risk guys" at the Clearing Firm or Bank.
They do not really need any capital from traders... but it helps weed out the stiffs.
Someone who can't even come up with 50K-100K... is a deadbeat with no history of success.
rm+

