Over 6000 Scientists, Doctors Sign Anti-lockdown Petition

[gwb-trading]

Right, and that's my point - it will be scrubbed. So when they list scientists and doctors that support the cause, they list the actual doctors and scientists. For example, on the first page - that you didn't respond to. All those scientists and doctors have been verified.

No comment on them?

It only has been scrubbed of signatures that they have been relentlessly mocked on social media about. Your "Jack the Ripper" signature will likely stay unless someone external of the declaration team notices it and makes a fuss about it.

Seeing that there are medical professionals and scientists already complaining that they did not sign the declaration but their signatures are there --- only serves to show how completely bogus and meaningless the declaration is.

Having a small list of doctors and scientists on the first page who have appeared on FOX News and SKY News as anti-lockdown advocates only serves to underline the bias of the "declaration".

This "declaration" is nothing more than a publicity stunt to create a false narrative that there are many scientists and doctors opposed to lockdowns --- a narrative which is simply not true.

 

[Ricter]

It only has been scrubbed of signatures that they have been relentlessly mocked on social media about. Your "Jack the Ripper" signature will likely stay unless someone external of the declaration team notices it and makes a fuss about it.

Seeing that there are medical professionals and scientists already complaining that they did not sign the declaration but their signatures are there --- only serves to show how completely bogus and meaningless the declaration is.

Having a small list of doctors and scientists who have appeared on FOX News and SKY News as anti-lockdown advocates only serves to underline the bias of the "declaration".

This "declaration" is nothing more than a publicity stunt to create a false narrative that there are many scientists and doctors opposed to lockdowns --- a narrative which is simply not true.

It's something for our resident cranks to run with for a few months, though.

 

[Tsing Tao]

It only has been scrubbed of signatures that they have been relentlessly mocked on social media about. Your "Jack the Ripper" signature will likely stay unless someone external of the declaration team notices it and makes a fuss about it.

Seeing that there are medical professionals and scientists already complaining that they did not sign the declaration but their signatures are there --- only serves to show how completely bogus and meaningless the declaration is.

Having a small list of doctors and scientists on the first page who have appeared on FOX News and SKY News as anti-lockdown advocates only serves to underline the bias of the "declaration".

This "declaration" is nothing more than a publicity stunt to create a false narrative that there are many scientists and doctors opposed to lockdowns --- a narrative which is simply not true.

How many doctors are complaining? Are you saying the dozens listed on the main page are fraudulent? If so, prove it. If not, are you going to go about discrediting them next?

 

[Tsing Tao]

It's something for our resident cranks to run with for a few months, though.

Ah, cranks. I remember that scientific poll as well!

 

[Cuddles]

Did they have to show an ID to put their name on this db? Cons would of course favor voting with such ease

 

[Tsing Tao]

Did they have to show an ID to put their name on this db? Cons would of course favor voting with such ease

If the "vote" changed the course of the United States, absolutely. Conservatives don't normally advocate providing ID for polls such as "People's Sexiest Woman" or "Pepsi vs. Coke".

 

[Overnight]

If the "vote" changed the course of the United States, absolutely. Conservatives don't normally advocate providing ID for polls such as "People's Sexiest Woman" or "Pepsi vs. Coke".

Pepsi with pizza, rum with Coke.

 

[jem]

The sad thing is... GWB and other pro lock down of the low risk fools don't even acknowledge that they have no ability to show that locking down the low risk saves overall harm.

And, now with the virus breaking out in places after they locked down... they can't even show the lock down saved infections....

But, they still support lockdowns of the low risk.

 

[gwb-trading]

The sad thing is... GWB and other pro lock down of the low risk fools don't even acknowledge that they have no ability to show that locking down the low risk saves overall harm.

And, now with the virus breaking out in places after they locked down... they can't even show the lock down saved infections....

But, they still support lockdowns of the low risk.

See "COVID-19 pandemic response in New Zealand"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_New_Zealand

 

[Frederick Foresight]

...they list the actual doctors and scientists...
...No comment on them?

Nothing like a little confirmation bias brought to you by your local podiatrist, eh?