Over 100 Million People in U.S. Now Receiving Some Form Of Federal Welfare

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

This is a heartless view on life, and not what even I, as a conservative believe in. I hope you never find yourself down on your luck, I really do. Something tells me your lack of charitable persona will get it's karma payback any way. I hope I'm wrong.

EXCUSE ME (oh sanctimonious one )! who whacked your sorry condescending ass with a stupid stick?
The federal gubbermint isn't the "ONLY" entity out there.

Thanks for reminding us how brainwashed you are, to jump to such a conclusion by default.


btw: I make my own frigging luck and besides that GOD likes me

 

[pspr]

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

......besides that GOD likes me

I thought you said you were a gay, male nurse.

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from pspr:

I thought you said you were a gay, male nurse.

I never said I was a nurse, isn't the gay nurse thing rcg or ak (they all look alike to me) ?

 

[pspr]

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

I never said I was a nurse, isn't the gay nurse thing rcg or ak (they all look alike to me) ?

I don't think RCG is gay - just a big liar/blowhard and the butt of many a nursey joke. Guess he could be gay.

AK is just not too bright. Since I have him on ignore I only see bits and pieces of his posts so I don't know his full story as purported.

 

[good ole boy]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

This whole aspect of calling people who receive government support as "moochers" is a bunch of horseshit. You guys really should get out more. Is a single mother supporting two kids by working two jobs and living in rent controlled housing - but still unable to pay all her bills without food stamps a "moocher"? Shame on you if you believe so.

It is feeding at the public trough. A single woman without the means to support children has no business reproducing in the first place. And why aren't the sperm donors ponying up? They didn't all die, most just flew the coop. Why should the public at large be perpetually burdened by such misguided and derelict behavior. Society has to find a way to minimize public dependency outcomes like single mothers earning minimum wage. There has been a growing trend toward single motherhood over the past 30-40 years. Single motherhood is fine for the high earner who never married and is pushing the edge of her reproductive years. But a 22 year old with three kids with no dad present must be an absolute rarity in the future. Public policy should be shaped toward this end. How, I am not sure. The creation by choice of dependent families is unfair to the children in those families, unfair to the taxpayer, and unfair to the dumb 22 year old mother of three, for goodness sakes.

 

[Spike Trader]

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

EXCUSE ME (oh sanctimonious one )! who whacked your sorry condescending ass with a stupid stick?
The federal gubbermint isn't the "ONLY" entity out there.

Thanks for reminding us how brainwashed you are, to jump to such a conclusion by default.


btw: I make my own frigging luck and besides that GOD likes me

Nice one Phoenix. . . . kick some butt..

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from Spiker:

Nice one Phoenix. . . . kick some butt..

I think tao got into some bad mushrooms it'll pass.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from good ole boy:

It is feeding at the public trough. A single woman without the means to support children has no business reproducing in the first place. And why aren't the sperm donors ponying up? They didn't all die, most just flew the coop. Why should the public at large be perpetually burdened by such misguided and derelict behavior. Society has to find a way to minimize public dependency outcomes like single mothers earning minimum wage. There has been a growing trend toward single motherhood over the past 30-40 years. Single motherhood is fine for the high earner who never married and is pushing the edge of her reproductive years. But a 22 year old with three kids with no dad present must be an absolute rarity in the future. Public policy should be shaped toward this end. How, I am not sure. The creation by choice of dependent families is unfair to the children in those families, unfair to the taxpayer, and unfair to the dumb 22 year old mother of three, for goodness sakes.

Teenage pregnancy, the largest source of single motherhood, is highly correlated with income inequality.

<img src="http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/images/560/teenage-births.gif">

 

[good ole boy]

Quote from Ricter:

Teenage pregnancy, the largest source of single motherhood, is highly correlated with income inequality.

<img src="http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/images/560/teenage-births.gif">

There's a 150 nations on the planet and this graph hs about 20.
How about including the Arab states. Huge Income inequality and low teenage unwed pregancies.

There was the same level of income inequality in the 1920s and the teenage pregancy rate was far lower. Clearly, Teenage pregancy is not an inevitable outcome of income inequality. It merely has a circumstantial association with income inequality.

How do you explain Portugal's having less than 1/2 the rate as the US but with almost as much inequality? You can't. Cultural factors are at play. The war against abortion has rendered it all but unavailable in many Red states. Many women would not get an abortion anyway. Conservatives don't want sex education taught in schools much less guidance on birth control. Teenagers
are not making informed decision and are not receiving proper education at home or in school. You think if you stuff money in the pockets of these teenagers' parents they magically would be rendered impervious to fertilization?

"Oh You don't have to wear a condom and i am not on birth control. But don't worry, my daddy's rich. I have a statistical low probability of getting pregnant! Let's fuck dude!"

Yeah right.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from pspr:

I don't think RCG is gay ...

I'm not so sure. I mean he lies about everything else, why not his "orientation"? He does wear skirts and panty hose to work.