Outrage: Virginia abortion bill sponsor saying plan would allow termination up until birth

well, his demise escalated quickly...
he should stick around, righties proved during the Kavanaugh hearings that they don't care about high school transgressions, no matter how criminal.

One of your progressive hero's has been outed as a baby killer and a racist and now the tard rats are running for the lifeboats trying to distance themselves.

Keep us posted on how that is going, along with how your socialist revolution is going in Venezuela. Howz your progressive hero Maduro working out there? You think he still think he should stick around too, as you say about Northam?

You might want to find a new set of losers to align yourself with. It's good to mix it up every once in a while.

Where's your lefty progressive hero Beto-boy these days? Looks like his fifteen minutes of fame might have maybe two or three minutes left on the clock. Might want to find a new loser to salivate over there too.


1lthdo.jpg
 
Last edited:
Well you said it is the individual'r right to choose which is the same tired argument you "You can't tell me what to do with my body!"

Now we are talking strickly science here and the science is complete, has been tested and verified, and there is no real scientific argument to the contrary.

Scientifically speaking the common thing that links a person's physical being is their DNA. From the hair at the top of their head, to their toenails, to their internal organ organs, their skin, their blood, every thing in a person's physical being.

This is not disputed. This is fact. If a person commits a murder and police find a single drop of the attackers blood, they conduct DNA testing and find an exact match. It is done all the time, the evidence from the DNA match is admissible in court. This is well accepted scientific fact.

Now lets say some chick is out getting the meat hammer in her sludge pot. I guess technically it doesnt have to be a chick, according to left wingers, a person can have a vagina and dress in men's clothing and that makes them a man, however we are talking science here so we will leave the fairy tales out of it. Now lets say that woman ends up pregnant. From the moment that sperm hits that egg and conception happens, the situation has changed entirely. That women has the same DNA, in her hair, mouth, lungs, heart, liver, pancreas, eye balls and so on. It will all be an exact match. What about that embryo? The scientific fact is, at the moment of conception, the genetic composition of that person is complete. When did Tsing Tao get his genetic make up? At conception. That same DNA is in you now and is an exact match to that moment in time. The embryo in the woman is not an exact match to anything in that woman's body.

So there we have it. We have scientifically determined that the embryo is not part of the woman's body, it is indeed its own living being. You cannot dispute a single claim and still support science. It is time for you to moderate your position.

getty_rm_photo_of_sperm_fertilizing_egg.jpg

I don't have to do any such thing.

There's no argument that an embryo is not part of a woman's body, and that is contains human DNA. If I cut myself and a drop of my blood hits the floor, the cells alive in that drop contain human DNA and it is no longer a part of my body. That doesn't mean the drop of blood gets the right to exist and should be treated as if it were a human being.
 
That the governor supported such a radical and murderous policy is why I would want him gone. The fact that he dressed up in a blackface costume some thirty years ago as a joke should have nothing to do with it. Who gives a shit?

It is amusing that the party who goes after people like this has him as a member. But this level of hypocrisy is prevalent in all politics.
 
That the governor supported such a radical and murderous policy is why I would want him gone. The fact that he dressed up in a blackface costume some thirty years ago as a joke should have nothing to do with it. Who gives a shit?

I agree. It is telling that the republicans only called for his resignation after the yearbook picture came to light. They made some pro forma complaints about his abortion comments but that was it.

They continue to play by the rules set out for them by progressives.
 
I don't have to do any such thing.

There's no argument that an embryo is not part of a woman's body, and that is contains human DNA. If I cut myself and a drop of my blood hits the floor, the cells alive in that drop contain human DNA and it is no longer a part of my body. That doesn't mean the drop of blood gets the right to exist and should be treated as if it were a human being.

Incorrect. The claim is that the embryo is part of the woman's body. That's your argument. It is scientifically incorrect.

If you cut yourself, that blood with be an exact DNA with the rest of your body. If a pregnant woman cuts herself, the DNA in that blood WILL NOT MATCH any part of that unborn child. The unborn child is one entity, the mother is an entirely different entity. This model is scientifically accurate. It supersedes your view.
 
Back
Top