Sure, small government - but in a democracy, you can't reduce the population. Therefore there needs to be good mechanisms in place to protect the democratic institution.
Just like doctors and other professionals are wooed by suppliers, organizations etc - politicians are wooed and sometimes financed by corporations or other special interests.
It is especially apparent in USA where the election spending is really "big business", but also evident in most democracies today.
The Georgia-Russia conflict, no doubt had a lot of commercial interests as well - along with other geopolitical strategic considerations. It was not "democracies" that wanted to go to war with each other, that is for sure.
There is a lot to gain from ridding ourselves with the current flawed parts which are so open to corruption and undemocratic influence/sabotage.

Just like doctors and other professionals are wooed by suppliers, organizations etc - politicians are wooed and sometimes financed by corporations or other special interests.
It is especially apparent in USA where the election spending is really "big business", but also evident in most democracies today.
The Georgia-Russia conflict, no doubt had a lot of commercial interests as well - along with other geopolitical strategic considerations. It was not "democracies" that wanted to go to war with each other, that is for sure.
There is a lot to gain from ridding ourselves with the current flawed parts which are so open to corruption and undemocratic influence/sabotage.
