Out: "NO COLLUSION!" In: "SOME COLLUSION!"

Max E. said:
Would love for one of the lefties to explain why it is illegal for Trump Jr. to do exactly what Hillary did., and btw, this is not even new news, They already admitted that the Russian lawyer had offered dirt on Hillary. a Long time ago, once again the media is hyperventilating just for the sake of hyperventilating.
More...

Hillary did exactly this? Which Russian government lawyer did HIllary meet exactly? Names please. And don't tell me some investigator (again NOT HILLARY) went to the Ukrainian embassy to seek info on Manafort which was public record as same as taking a secret meeting (aka collusion) which you lie about until found out by investigators.

Max E. said:
Article dated July 2017, once again the mainstream media is full of shit, we already knew that Trump Jr. went to the meeting expecting to get dirt on Clinton, but he didnt get any, the story hasnt changed.

Donald Trump has defended his son in public over his meeting with a Russian lawyer last year, telling a press conference in Paris “most people would have taken that meeting” and ignoring questions about whether offers of political assistance from potential agents of foreign governments should be reported to the FBI.

Pre-empting the New York Times, which first reported the meeting, Trump Jr this week released emails in which he appeared eager to accept information from the Russian government that could have damaged Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/13/donald-trump-response-to-trump-jr-russia-meeting
More...

'We' knew that in July of 2017 about a meeting a year back because NYT caught Don Jr lying about it - he lied about the contacts in his security clearance forms which is a felony. Why would they lie about such a harmless meeting. It's a rhetorical question.
 
Max E. said:
Article dated July 2017, once again the mainstream media is full of shit, we already knew that Trump Jr. went to the meeting expecting to get dirt on Clinton, but he didnt get any, the story hasnt changed.

Donald Trump has defended his son in public over his meeting with a Russian lawyer last year, telling a press conference in Paris “most people would have taken that meeting” and ignoring questions about whether offers of political assistance from potential agents of foreign governments should be reported to the FBI.

Pre-empting the New York Times, which first reported the meeting, Trump Jr this week released emails in which he appeared eager to accept information from the Russian government that could have damaged Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/13/donald-trump-response-to-trump-jr-russia-meeting
More...


Trump Sr. Had never admitted to the meeting being about Hillary dirt. They tried to pass it as adoptions BS after having denied it at first. Also after having denied having anything to do with the press release about the meeting which he dictated.
 
Here4money said:
Apples and oranges. Hillary used domestic funds to hire a foreigner. Trump used foreign funds to obtain dirt obtained through illegal means (if talking about hacked Intel).
More...


Proof that he obtained the hacked info or it didnt happen.

So your saying if he had just paid someone domestically to go out and talk to russians to gain info its not illegal, but its illegal to go himself, in other words your saying its legal to pay someone to commit a crime as long as you dont go out and commit the crime yourself. lol you guys and the spin on this is simply amazing.

If they try to impeach Trump on this and Hillary doesnt go to jail, for doing exactly the same thing, theres going to be pitchforks and torches coming out.
 
Max E. said:
So your saying if he had just paid someone domestically to go out and talk to russians to gain info its not illegal, but its illegal to go himself, in other words your saying its legal to pay someone to commit a crime as long as you dont go out and commit the crime yourself. lol you guys and the spin on this is simply amazing.
.
More...

Because one is a CAMPAIGN DONATION, the other is PAID WORK. Something of value came INTO the campaign in the first instance, something of value went OUT in the second instance. Why is this hard to understand? There is no crime in paying a foreigner to work on your campaign, the crime is accepting donations from them.

The fact that you don't understand the difference is WHY you are a Trump supporter.
 
exGOPer said:
Because one is a CAMPAIGN DONATION, the other is PAID WORK. Something of value came INTO the campaign in the first instance, something of value went OUT in the second instance. Why is this hard to understand? There is no crime in paying a foreigner to work on your campaign, the crime is accepting donations from them.

The fact that you don't understand the difference is WHY you are a Trump supporter.
More...


The only person we know for a fact paid for dirt from the Russians is Hillary Clinton. Thats a fact no matter how many times you try to spin it.
 
Max E. said:
The only person we know for a fact paid for dirt from the Russians is Hillary Clinton. Thats a fact no matter how many times you try to spin it.
More...

Yes, PAID them - as I said, it's not illegal to PAY foreigners for their work when you are running a campaign - what's illegal is TAKING DONATIONS aka GETTING PAID from foreigners.

Where is the spin here? Do you not understand the difference?

https://electionlawblog.org/?p=93740
 
Max E. said:
Proof that he obtained the hacked info or it didnt happen.

So your saying if he had just paid someone domestically to go out and talk to russians to gain info its not illegal, but its illegal to go himself, in other words your saying its legal to pay someone to commit a crime as long as you dont go out and commit the crime yourself. lol you guys and the spin on this is simply amazing.

If they try to impeach Trump on this and Hillary doesnt go to jail, for doing exactly the same thing, theres going to be pitchforks and torches coming out.
More...

If you can't see the difference there's no point on spoon feeding you any more.
 
0b3xE53.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top